The Impact of Heparin on Mortality Following Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:2
|
作者
Cuen-Ojeda, Cesar [1 ]
Li, Ben [1 ]
Tam, Derrick Y. [1 ]
Dharma, Christoffer [1 ]
Feridooni, Tiam [1 ]
Eisenberg, Naomi [1 ]
Roche-Nagle, Graham [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, 6E-218,200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR; VASCULAR-SURGERY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2023.03.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Systemic administration of heparin is widely used in patients undergoing open elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, no clear consensus exists in the use of intraoperative heparin during open ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair. In this study, we assessed the safety of intravenous heparin administration in patients undergoing open rAAA repair.Methods: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients who received and did not receive heparin during open rAAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2003 and 2020 was conducted. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 10-year mortality. The secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, number of packed red blood cells transfused, early postoperative transfusions, and postsurgical complications. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potentially confounding variables. The outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using relative risk for binary outcomes and paired t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. Survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: A total of 2,410 patients who underwent open rAAA repair between 2003 and 2020 were studied. Of the 2,410 patients, 1,853 patients received intraoperative heparin and 557 did not. Propensity score matching on 25 variables yielded 519 pairs for the heparin to no heparin comparison. Thirty-day mortality was lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.84) and in-hospital was also lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.77). Furthermore, estimated blood loss was 910 mL (95% CI: 230 mL to 1,590 mL) lower in the heparin group and the mean number of packed red blood cells transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively were 17 units lower in the heparin group (95% CI: 8-42). Ten-year survival was higher for patients who received heparin, and their rate of survival was approximately 40% higher than those who did not receive heparin (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72; P < 0.0001).Conclusions: In patients who received systemic heparin administration at the time of open rAAA repair, there were significant short-term and long-term survival benefits within 30 days and at 10 years. Heparin administration may have afforded a mortality benefit or been a surrogate for healthier and less moribund patients at the time of the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Concentrating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in specialized centers
    Marine, Leopoldo
    Mertens, Renato
    Valdes, Francisco
    Torrealba, Jose Ignacio
    Bergoeing, Michel
    Vargas, Jose Francisco
    Villarroel, Ricardo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2022, 150 (06) : 788 - 801
  • [42] Open abdominal management after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: from a single-center study in Japan
    Maze, Yasumi
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Kawaguchi, Teruhisa
    Murakami, Masahiko
    Inoue, Ryosai
    Hirano, Koji
    Sato, Keita
    Tamura, Yoshihisa
    SURGERY TODAY, 2023, 53 (04) : 420 - 427
  • [43] Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Scali, Salvatore T.
    Stone, David H.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [44] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients
    Reichart, M
    Geelkerken, RH
    Huisman, AB
    van Det, RJ
    de Smit, P
    Volker, EP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (05) : 479 - 486
  • [45] Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - A challenge to open repair? Results of a single centre experience in 20 patients
    Hinchliffe, RJ
    Yusuf, SW
    Macierewicz, JA
    MacSweeney, STR
    Wenham, PW
    Hopkinson, BR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 22 (06) : 528 - 534
  • [46] Using machine learning to predict outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Li, Ben
    Aljabri, Badr
    Verma, Raj
    Beaton, Derek
    Eisenberg, Naomi
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Rotstein, Ori D.
    de Mestral, Charles
    Mamdani, Muhammad
    Roche-Nagle, Graham
    Al-Omran, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 78 (06) : 1426 - 1438.e6
  • [47] Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA)
    Simeng Zhang
    Jiaxuan Feng
    Haiyan Li
    Yongxue Zhang
    Qingsheng Lu
    Zaiping Jing
    Heart and Vessels, 2016, 31 : 1291 - 1302
  • [48] The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Powell, Janet T.
    Sweeting, Michael J.
    Thompson, Matthew M.
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    Ashleigh, Ray
    Bell, Rachel
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Ulug, Pinar
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (21) : 1328 - U137
  • [49] Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA)
    Zhang, Simeng
    Feng, Jiaxuan
    Li, Haiyan
    Zhang, Yongxue
    Lu, Qingsheng
    Jing, Zaiping
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2016, 31 (08) : 1291 - 1302
  • [50] Management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Saqib, N. U.
    Cho, J. S.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 19 (04): : 181 - 189