Models of critical thinkins: analysis, classification and philosophical foundations

被引:2
作者
Rodriguez-Ortiz, Angelica Maria [1 ]
Hernandez-Rodriguez, Juan Camilo [2 ]
Lopez-Rua, Ana Milena [1 ]
Cadavid-Alzate, Valentina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
[2] Univ Nacl Colombia, Manizales, Colombia
来源
SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION | 2023年 / 35期
关键词
Critical thinking; rationality; cognition; pragmatism; science; philosophy; DISPOSITIONS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.17163/soph.n35.2023.07
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Today, there are many conceptualizations on critical thinking, and most of them focus on cognitive skills, problem solving, decision-making and action, while others integrate all these aspects. In view of these multiple conceptualizations, a need to classify models arises to better understand their approaches and, in particular, the scope of the constituent elements that compose the supporting philosophical currents. This, so teachers know what each of these models contributes to their classroom practices. Objective: To identify the constituent elements of the conceptual foundations of critical thinking for classification into models according to their purposes. Methodology: A conceptual analysis, based on analytical philosophy, was used to review the main theoretical concepts of 44 theorists. Analysis matrices were designed with 12 constituents that aided in evidencing the elements of each model and determining which philosophical currents supported them. Results: Four models were identified: the logical-rational model, the cognitive-emotive model, the cognitive-scientist model, and the sociopragmatic model. These models show the influence of great philosophers' contributions that, based on their epistemic content, have linked criticality as a main element in the construction of knowledge. Conclusions: These models will help teachers train critical thinkers to question and transform their social environment In the classroom.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 248
页数:38
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Adorno T., 1998, Educacion e Emancipacion
[2]   Language, institution and person [J].
AGUERO, G. U. S. T. A. V. O. A. L. F. R. E. D. O. .
SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2022, (33) :91-111
[3]  
AGUILAR Marisol, 2000, MAGISTRALIS, V18, P115
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ASCHEERIC HIGHER ED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PERSPECTIVAS PSICOLO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ESSENTIAL PEIRCE
[7]  
Arnau J., 2008, El arte de probar: ironia y logica en la India antigua
[8]  
Austin J. L., 1962, How to do things with words, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oSo/9780198245537.001.0001
[9]  
AYER Alfred, 1961, POSITIVISMO LOGICO
[10]   Common misconceptions of critical thinking [J].
Bailin, S ;
Case, R ;
Coombs, JR ;
Daniels, LB .
JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 1999, 31 (03) :269-283