Evaluation of the clinical performance of BD SARS-CoV-2 flu assay for BD CORTM System

被引:0
|
作者
Lockamy, Elizabeth [1 ]
Martin, Rebekah M. [1 ]
Ippolito, Jordan [1 ]
机构
[1] Becton Dickinson & Co, BD Life Sci Integrated Diagnost Solut, 7 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD 21152 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS | 2023年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
BD COR; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Influenza; Multiplex RT-PCR assay;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100170
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Differentiating between SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza (flu) A and B is often difficult without laboratory testing as the symptomology of these respiratory viral infections overlap. Objective: Evaluate the clinical performance of the BD CORTM System multiplex assay (COR SC2/Flu) to detect the three viral pathogens using single nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Materials and methods: Swabs collected from 203 symptomatic and 144 asymptomatic individuals were tested using COR SC2/Flu. Results were compared to those from the BioFire (R) Respiratory Panel 2.1 (BioFire RP2.1) and positive and negative percent agreements (PPA and NPA, respectively) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: For asymptomatic individuals (n = 144), PPA between COR SC2/Flu and BioFire RP2.1 was 100% (95% CI: 79.6-100) and NPA was 97.7% (95% CI: 93.4-99.2) for the SARS-CoV-2 target. For symptomatic individuals (n = 203), PPA was 100% (95% CI: 92.9-100) and NPA 99.3% (95% CI: 96.4-99.9) for the SARS-CoV-2 target. PPA was 94.0% (95% CI: 83.8-97.9) and NPA was 98.7% (95% CI: 95.4-99.6) for the flu A target. PPA was 100% (95% CI: 92.9-100) and NPA was 100% (95% CI: 97.6-100) for flu B. Conclusion: The continued development and validation of multiplex assays to detect SARS-CoV-2, flu A, and flu B should remain a crucial component of diagnostics as these viruses will continue to coexist in the post-pandemic environment. COR SC2/Flu assay performance met the predetermined clinical specifications for PPA and NPA for SARS-CoV-2, flu A, and flu B detection, and should help support infection control efforts of those diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of STANDARDTM M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples
    Parakatselaki, Maria-Eleni
    Alexi, Georgia
    Zafiropoulos, Alexandros
    Sourvinos, George
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [42] Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens
    Hogan, Catherine A.
    Garamani, Natasha
    Lee, Andrew S.
    Tung, Jack K.
    Sahoo, Malaya K.
    Huang, ChunHong
    Stevens, Bryan
    Zehnder, James
    Pinsky, Benjamin A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [43] Evaluation of RT-LAMP Assay for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Li, Ya-Ping
    Cao, Xun-Jie
    Luo, Xin
    Xie, Tian-Ao
    Liu, Wan-Jun
    Xie, Shi-Ming
    Lin, Min
    Guo, Xu-Guang
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 54 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [44] Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Capture IgM Antibody Assay in Convalescent Sera
    Ha, Binh
    Jadhao, Samadhan
    Hussaini, Laila
    Gibson, Theda
    Stephens, Kathy
    Ciric, Caroline
    Taylor, Meg
    Rouphael, Nadine
    Edupuganti, Srilatha
    Rostad, Christina A.
    Tompkins, S. Mark
    Anderson, Evan J.
    Anderson, Larry J.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (02):
  • [45] Performance of the LIAISON(R) SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay vs. SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR
    Fiedler, Melanie
    Holtkamp, Caroline
    Dittmer, Ulf
    Anastasiou, Olympia E.
    PATHOGENS, 2021, 10 (06):
  • [46] Evaluation of four commercial, fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests suggests a revision of the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay
    Irsara, Christian
    Egger, Alexander E.
    Prokop, Wolfgang
    Nairz, Manfred
    Loacker, Lorin
    Sahanic, Sabina
    Pizzini, Alex
    Sonnweber, Thomas
    Mayer, Wolfgang
    Schennach, Harald
    Loeffler-Ragg, Judith
    Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa
    Tancevski, Ivan
    Weiss, Guenter
    Anliker, Markus
    Griesmacher, Andrea
    Hoermann, Gregor
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (06) : 1143 - 1154
  • [47] Performance Assessment of the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay On Nasopharyngeal Swabs
    Baj, Andreina
    Zago, Cristian
    Colombo, Alberto
    Cassani, Gianluca
    Rossi, Agostino
    Pasciuta, Renee
    Novazzi, Federica
    Prestia, Martina
    Capuano, Riccardo
    Genoni, Angelo
    Azzi, Lorenzo
    Dalla Gasperina, Daniela
    Spezia, Pietro Giorgio
    Focosi, Daniele
    Maggi, Fabrizio
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2021, 44 (04) : 205 - 209
  • [48] Accuracy of an antigen-detecting SARS-CoV-2 assay with self- and provider-collected specimens interpreted visually and with BD Veritor TM Plus analyzer
    Cooper, Lauren
    Eckert, Karen
    Mann, Joseph
    Montalvo, Rossmeri
    Castillo, Luis
    Fellows, Dwan
    Young, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [49] Performance evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B combo rapid antigen test
    Rosenblatt, Kevin P.
    Romeu, Hugo
    Romeu, Camille
    Granger, Elder
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2024, 11
  • [50] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 BD Veritor Nasal Antigen Test with Nasopharyngeal Reverse Transcription-PCR in Symptomatic Patients
    Koga, Paula
    Maluf, Maira
    Nunes, Fabiane
    Campos, Juliana
    Gazarini, Livia
    Borghoff, Tatiane
    Libanori, Glais
    Martino, Marines
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (05):