Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China

被引:4
作者
Xie, Jingjing [1 ]
Li, Kai [1 ]
Fan, Jingli [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Xueting [3 ]
Li, Jia [4 ,5 ]
Xian, Yujiao [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Ctr Sustainable Dev & Energy Policy Res, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Resources & Safe Min, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Sci & Technol, Adm Ctr Chinas Agenda 21, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol Guangzhou, Carbon Neutral & Climate Change Thrust, Guangzhou 511400, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Jiangmen Lab Carbon Sci & Technol, Jiangmen 529199, Peoples R China
[6] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
coal-to-liquid; carbon capture; utilization and storage (CCUS); carbon footprint; levelized cost of liquid; lifecycle assessment; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HYDROGEN PROCESS; CO2; EMISSION; CCS; POWER; LCOE;
D O I
10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO2 footprint by 28%-57% from 5.91 t CO2/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%-49% from 7.10 t CO2/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648-1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653-1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285-1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101-9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO2 transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 427
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NO 1 SOURCE OIL ENER
[3]   Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants [J].
Bassano, Claudia ;
Deiana, Paolo ;
Vilardi, Giorgio ;
Verdone, Nicola .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 263
[4]   An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential [J].
Budinis, Sara ;
Krevor, Samuel ;
Mac Dowell, Niall ;
Brandon, Nigel ;
Hawkes, Adam .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 22 :61-81
[5]  
Cai B.F., 2020, Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) Report in China (2019) R. Center for Climate Change and Environmental Policy
[6]  
CCTD, 2021, RES BAS IND
[7]  
China International E-Coumerce Network, 2022, COMM PRIC IND CPPI 2
[8]  
China Logistics Information Center (CLIC), 2023, CHIN HIGHW LOG FREIG
[9]  
China Price Information Network, 2021, LAT YEARS PRIC DAT
[10]  
Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, ADM CTR CHIN AG 21 C