Diagnostic clinical prediction rules for categorising low back pain: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Hill, Charles James [1 ]
Banerjee, Anirban [1 ]
Hill, Jonathan [1 ]
Stapleton, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Keele, Newcastle Under Lyme, England
关键词
clinical decision support system; clinical prediction rules; decision support tool; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic rules; low back pain; predictive models; REPORTED HISTORY QUESTIONNAIRE; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; PRIMARY-CARE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; SUBGROUPING PATIENTS; SUPPORT TOOL; SPONDYLOARTHRITIS; CLASSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/msc.1816
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a common complex condition, where specific diagnoses are hard to identify. Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are known to improve clinical decision-making. A review of LBP diagnostic-CPRs by Haskins et al. (2015) identified six diagnostic-CPRs in derivation phases of development, with one tool ready for implementation. Recent progress on these tools is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate developments in LBP diagnostic-CPRs and evaluate their readiness for implementation.MethodsA systematic review was performed on five databases (Medline, Amed, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) combined with hand-searching and citation-tracking to identify eligible studies. Study and tool quality were appraised for risk of bias (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2), methodological quality (checklist using accepted CPR methodological standards), and CPR tool appraisal (GRade and ASsess Predictive).ResultsOf 5021 studies screened, 11 diagnostic-CPRs were identified. Of the six previously known, three have been externally validated but not yet undergone impact analysis. Five new tools have been identified since Haskin et al. (2015); all are still in derivation stages. The most validated diagnostic-CPRs include the Lumbar-Spinal-Stenosis-Self-Administered-Self-Reported-History-Questionnaire and Diagnosis-Support-Tool-to-Identify-Lumbar-Spinal-Stenosis, and the StEP-tool which differentiates radicular from axial-LBP.ConclusionsThis updated review of LBP diagnostic CPRs found five new tools, all in the early stages of development. Three previously known tools have now been externally validated but should be used with caution until impact evaluation studies are undertaken. Future funding should focus on externally validating and assessing the impact of existing CPRs on clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1482 / 1496
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Distinctions Between Diagnostic and Classification Criteria? [J].
Aggarwal, Rohit ;
Ringold, Sarah ;
Khanna, Dinesh ;
Neogi, Tuhina ;
Johnson, Sindhu R. ;
Miller, Amy ;
Brunner, Hermine I. ;
Ogawa, Rikke ;
Felson, David ;
Ogdie, Alexis ;
Aletaha, Daniel ;
Feldman, Brian M. .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2015, 67 (07) :891-897
[2]   Role of the Self-Administered, Self-Reported History Questionnaire to Identify Types of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Sensitivity Analysis [J].
Aghaei, Hossein Nayeb ;
Azimi, Parisa ;
Shahzadi, Sohrab ;
Azhari, Shirzad ;
Mohammadi, Hassan Reza .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) :689-693
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Microsoft excel
[4]   Identification of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Might Benefit From Additional Psychological Assessment [J].
Apeldoorn, Adri T. ;
Bosselaar, Henk ;
Ostelo, Raymond W. ;
Blom-Luberti, Tanja ;
van der Ploeg, Tjeerd ;
Fritz, Julie M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (01) :23-31
[5]   Clinical prediction rules: What are they and what do they tell us? [J].
Beattie, Paul ;
Nelson, Roger .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2006, 52 (03) :157-163
[6]  
Benditz A., 2019, BIOMED RES INT-UK, V13140, P8
[7]   A clinical decision support system in back pain helps to find the diagnosis: a prospective correlation study [J].
Benditz, Achim ;
Pulido, Loreto C. ;
Grifka, Joachim ;
Ripke, Fabian ;
Jansen, Petra .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (02) :621-625
[8]   Clinical Prediction Rules for Physical Therapy Interventions: A Systematic Review [J].
Beneciuk, Jason M. ;
Bishop, Mark D. ;
George, Steven Z. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 89 (02) :114-124
[9]   Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review [J].
Binuya, M. A. E. ;
Engelhardt, E. G. ;
Schats, W. ;
Schmidt, M. K. ;
Steyerberg, E. W. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[10]   Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review [J].
Bouwmeester, Walter ;
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A. ;
Mallett, Susan ;
Geerlings, Mirjam I. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)