Long-term fencing can't benefit plant and microbial network stability of alpine meadow and alpine steppe in Three-River-Source National Park

A great number of fencing facilities has been established in Three-River-Source National Park. However, with the transformation of wild animals into the main consumers of grassland ecosystem and the increasing years of fence (>15 years), whether the fence still has a positive effect on grassland ecosystem has become controversial. Therefore, taking the alpine steppe and alpine meadow in Three-River-Source National Park as the case study, this study focused on the effects of long-term enclosure on different ecological components by investigating plant communities, soil physical and chemical characteristics and soil microbial characteristics (16S, ITS). Furthermore, we evaluated the ecological benefits of long-term fencing based on the stability of plant communities and microbial networks. We found that fencing did not significantly promote the stability of plant community in different grassland types. The analysis of bacteria-fungal symbiotic network indicated that fencing significantly reduced the stability of soil microbial network in alpine meadows. The results of structural equation showed that the microbial community was indirectly affected by the changes of soil moisture content (SMC) and soil total nutrient content in the alpine steppe, and the stability of microbial network was significantly correlated with the diversity of fungal community. In alpine meadows, fencing indirectly affected soil microbial community by changing SMC and pH. High SMC was not conducive to microbial network stability, while high plant community stability was beneficial to microbial network stability. Network stability was remarkably related to bacterial community composition and diversity, as well as fungal community diversity. Therefore, in Three-River-Source