Determining the ecological compensation standards based on willingness to accept (WTA) for intensive agricultural production areas: A case in China

被引:6
作者
Zhang, Zhonghao [1 ]
Cui, Yanzi [2 ]
Wang, Lei [3 ]
Sun, Ximan [1 ]
Gao, Yang [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Normal Univ, Inst Urban Studies, Sch Environm & Geog Sci, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, Environm Dev Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, 231 Tuhua Bldg, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Agr Land Qualify Monitoring & Control, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological compensation; Compensation standard; Willingness to accept; Ecosystem services; Nonpoint source pollution; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTION; FARMERS; NUTRIENT; LOSSES; RUNOFF; COUNTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103051
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Ecological compensation is an effective way to encourage farmers to use minimal chemical fertilizers by paying for their losses when agricultural planting methods change. In this research, we conducted field surveys and created a conceptual framework to determine the compensation standard based on farmers' willingness to accept (WTA) and ecosystem service values in a rotational double cropping area of winter wheat-summer maize, Huantai County, China. The results showed that the farmers' average WTA on the chemical fertilizer reduction application fluctuates within a range of 250.00-7740.00 CNY/hm2. The limiting compensation standards range from 362.74 to 4823.43 CNY/hm2 and the ceiling standard is from 367.29 to 4851.83 CNY/hm2 by reducing chemical fertilizer application from 5% to 95%. Huantai County has a potential of 15%-35% for chemical fertilizer reduction, and the compensation standard is the lowest (362.74 CNY/hm2) when 25% of the current chemical fertilizer usage is reduced. Our research provided a valid approach to determining ecological compensation standards toward the aims of efficiency and sustainability for protecting farmland ecology and highlighting the critical ecosystem service changes caused by the farmland fertilizer reduction program in China.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Bazie M. M., 2018, J WATER RESOURCE PRO, V10, P41
  • [2] The stocks and flows of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium across a 30-year time series for agriculture in Huantai county, China
    Bellarby, Jessica
    Surridge, Ben W. J.
    Haygarth, PhilipM.
    Liu, Kun
    Siciliano, Giuseppina
    Smith, Laurence
    Rahn, Clive
    Meng, Fanqiao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 619 : 606 - 620
  • [3] Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers
    Bernues, Alberto
    Tello-Garcia, Elena
    Rodriguez-Ortega, Tamara
    Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon
    Casasus, Isabel
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 59 : 130 - 142
  • [4] Assessments of ecosystem service indicators and stakeholder's willingness to pay for selected ecosystem services in the Chure region of Nepal
    Bhandari, Pratima
    Mohan, K. C.
    Shrestha, Sujata
    Aryal, Achyut
    Shrestha, Uttam Babu
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 69 : 25 - 34
  • [5] Bridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain
    Campos, Pablo
    Caparros, Alejandro
    Oviedo, Jose L.
    Ovando, Paola
    Alvarez-Farizo, Begona
    Diaz-Balteiro, Luis
    Carranza, Juan
    Begueria, Santiago
    Diaz, Mario
    Casimiro Herruzo, A.
    Martinez-Pena, Fernando
    Solino, Mario
    Alvarez, Alejandro
    Martinez-Jauregui, Maria
    Pasalodos-Tato, Maria
    de Frutos, Pablo
    Aldea, Jorge
    Almazan, Eloy
    Concepcion, Elena D.
    Mesa, Bruno
    Romero, Carlos
    Serrano-Notivoli, Roberto
    Fernandez, Cristina
    Torres-Porras, Jeronimo
    Montero, Gregorio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 157 : 218 - 236
  • [6] Investigating rice farmers' preferences for an agri-environmental scheme: Is an eco-label a substitute for payments?
    Chang, Sheng-Han-Erin
    Wuepper, David
    Heissenhuber, Alois
    Sauer, Johannes
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 64 : 374 - 382
  • [7] Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, 2003, TECHN GUID NAT WAT E
  • [8] Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead
    Cord, Anna F.
    Bartkowski, Bartosz
    Beckmann, Michael
    Dittrich, Andreas
    Hermans-Neumann, Kathleen
    Kaim, Andrea
    Lienhoop, Nele
    Locher-Krause, Karla
    Priess, Joerg
    Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph
    Schwarz, Nina
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Strauch, Michael
    Vaclavik, Tomas
    Volk, Martin
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 264 - 272
  • [9] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [10] Costanza R, 2017, STU ECO ECO, V6, P367, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_16