The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods

被引:45
作者
Brodny, Jaroslaw [1 ]
Tutak, Magdalena [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Tech Univ, Gliwice, Poland
关键词
sustainable development; innovativeness; EU-27; MCDM methods; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE; DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE; EU COUNTRIES; IMPACT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.24136/oc.2023.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research background: Sustainable development of the modern world represents an oppor-tunity to preserve economic growth and technological progress, as well as social development, without limiting the possibilities of this development for past generations. The directions of this development are included in the 17 goals and 169 tasks of the 2030 Agenda for Sustaina-ble Development. The achievement of these goals and the implementation of the adopted tasks is a huge challenge for individual countries and regions. This also applies to the Europe-an Union (EU), where economic development is closely linked to environmental protection and social inclusion. Of key importance in this context is Objective 9 of Agenda 2030, and thus its level of implementation in the EU-27 countries is the aim of the research presented in this paper.Purpose of the article: The research involved assessing the level of EU countries in terms of building stable infrastructure, promoting sustainable industrialization and fostering innova-tion, i.e., the main areas of Goal 9 of Agenda 2030.Methods: The assessment was based on the EU-27 countries' sustainable development index (SDG9) determined with the use of 14 indicators characterizing these areas between 2015- 2020. The basis of the developed methodology was a multi criteria decision making approach (MCDM methods). TOPSIS, WASPAS and EDAS methods were used to determine the sus-tainability index, and the Entropy, CRITIC and standard deviation (SD) methods were used to determine weights for the adopted indicators. In addition, the use of the Spearman's and Kendall's Tau non-parametric tests enabled the analysis of the relationship between the SDG9 index and the basic economic, environmental and energy parameters, as well as the digitaliza-tion of the countries under study.Findings & value added: The results show that the EU-27 countries vary widely in terms of implementing Sustainable Development Goal 9 of Agenda 2030 over the analyzed period. Now, the most advanced in this respect are Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, the Nether-lands, Finland, and Sweden. By contrast, substantial problems are found in Bulgaria, Greece, Portugal, and Lithuania. The results also provide an opportunity to trace changes in the value of the designated index in individual countries, and in groups of countries of the "old" and "new" EU. These results significantly enrich the knowledge of the effectiveness of implement-ing Goal 9 of Agenda 2030 in the EU-27 countries and the relationship between the develop-ment of individual countries and sustainable development economy. These findings can also be used to create new EU-27 strategies for sustainable and solidarity-based development of the whole EU. In addition, the results can be helpful to decision-makers as they highlight important indicators related to innovation, industrialization and infrastructure that should be considered when formulating a country's sustainable development strategy. The added value of the study is the research procedure presented, which can be used in analyses on the study of various issues related to sustainable development for other groups of regions.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 102
页数:56
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Investigating the causal relationship between transport infrastructure, transport energy consumption and economic growth in Tunisia [J].
Achour, Houda ;
Belloumi, Mounir .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :988-998
[2]   Global assessment of technological innovation for climate change adaptation and mitigation in developing world [J].
Adenle, Ademola A. ;
Azadi, Hossein ;
Arbiol, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 161 :261-275
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, eurostat. Database
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Sustainable Development Report
[5]   Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology [J].
Aytekin, Ahmet ;
Ecer, Fatih ;
Korucuk, Selcuk ;
Karamasa, Caglar .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
[6]   Infrastructure development and its influence on agricultural land and regional sustainable development [J].
Bacior, Stanislaw ;
Prus, Barbara .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 44 :82-93
[7]   THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BARBIER, EB .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (02) :101-110
[8]   Relationship between innovation and sustainability in Latin American countries: Differences by perceptual characteristics of early-stage entrepreneurs [J].
Barrera Verdugo, Gustavo .
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 7 (01)
[9]   Biogas and EU's 2020 targets: Evidence from a regional case study in Italy [J].
Bartolini, Fabio ;
Gava, Oriana ;
Brunori, Gianluca .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 109 :510-519
[10]   The impact of technological innovation and governance institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth: Evidence from a dynamic relationship [J].
Bekhet, Hussain Ali ;
Latif, Nurul Wahilah Abdul .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2018, 54 :27-40