Transforming Europe? The EU's industrial policy and geopolitical turn

被引:64
作者
McNamara, Kathleen R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Mortara Ctr Int Studies, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Mortara Ctr Int Studies, 3600 N St NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
European union; industrial policy; geopolitics; European commission; neoliberalism; state-building; ECONOMIC PATRIOTISM; COMMISSION; POLITICIZATION; INTEGRATION; COMPETITION; UNION;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2023.2230247
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Markets require rules, made and enforced by governments, and modern market-making has therefore unfolded as an intrinsic part of state-building. While the European Union is not a state, it has not been immune to these processes. Over the last three decades it has expanded its Single European Market and created a currency while constructing European political authority and deepening its institutional capacities. The EU has done this through supranational market-making largely centred on neoliberal precepts of competition and openness. Today, however, the EU is breaking with that tradition by pursuing a visibly interventionist European industrial policy and geopolitical market strategy. I suggest a theoretical framework to illuminate how this policy turn may reconfigure the EU's political authority and build it as a polity. After briefly identifying the contours of the new European industrial and geoeconomic policy, I outline a research agenda to probe how the new market activism may reformulate societal interests and coalitions, increase the politicisation of the EU's governing institutions, raise the stakes for democratic legitimation, and project the EU as a geopolitical actor. The conclusion notes how this new market-making translates into significant policy challenges for both the EU and the international economic order.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2396
页数:26
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Economic Foundations of the Territorial State System
    Acharya, Avidit
    Lee, Alexander
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (04) : 954 - 966
  • [2] Albrecht J. P., 2023, WHY EUROPEAN RESPONS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Recovery Plan: powering Europes strategic autonomy-Speech by President Charles Michel at the Brussels Economic Forum
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, State of the Union Address Strasbourg
  • [5] Babi M., 2022, The Political Economy of Geoeconomics: Europe in a Changing World, P1
  • [6] Baccaro L., 2022, Diminishing Returns: The New Politics of Growth and Stagnation
  • [7] Bauerle Danzman S., 2023, EUS GEOECONOMIC TURN
  • [8] Bertuzzi L., 2022, EU COUNTRIES REACH C
  • [9] Toward a more 'sovereign' Europe? Domestic, bilateral, and European factors to explain France's (growing) influence on EU politics, 2017-2022
    Bora, Salih Isik
    Schramm, Lucas
    [J]. FRENCH POLITICS, 2023, 21 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [10] EU Actors under pressure: politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses
    Bressanelli, Edoardo
    Koop, Christel
    Reh, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 27 (03) : 329 - 341