Facilitating public procurement of innovation in the UK defence and health sectors: Innovation intermediaries as institutional entrepreneurs

被引:15
作者
Selviaridis, Kostas [1 ]
Hughes, Alan [1 ,2 ]
Spring, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Management Sci, Management Sch, Bailrigg Campus, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Business Sch, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Public procurement of innovation; Innovation intermediaries; Institutional entrepreneurship; Institutional change; Innovation policy; Public procurement; DEMAND; POLICY; ORGANIZATIONS; TYPOLOGY; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; ACTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2022.104673
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how innovation intermediaries promote institutional change to facilitate public pro-curement of innovation (PPI). Several of the PPI implementation challenges reported in prior research originate in the institutional architecture underpinning demand articulation, and innovation procurement and adoption processes. We conceptualise innovation intermediaries as institutional entrepreneurs who seek to create new institutions or adjust existing ones to support PPI implementation. We report the results of two case studies of intermediaries facilitating PPI in the UK defence and health sectors, respectively. We contribute to PPI intermediation literature by showing that intermediaries address prevalent institutional failures through four types of institutional entrepreneurship activities: boundary spanning; advocacy; design of change; and capacity building. We elucidate, in particular, the role of individuals within intermediaries, as agents who learn about failures and adapt their institutional work over time. In doing so, these managers go beyond the remit and goals of the organisations they represent. The findings add to our understanding of how intermediaries support demand articulation for PPI by showing that their institutional work is also aimed at designing generic methods and processes to improve what is asked for, and how. We furthermore reveal conditions influencing the effectiveness of intermediaries' efforts to realise institutional change, thereby extending research on institutional entrepre-neurship in PPI settings.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) Network, 2021, AC HLTH SCI NETW
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HIGH QUALITY CARE AL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Center for International Governance Innovation Pa
[4]   Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? [J].
Aschhoff, Birgit ;
Sofka, Wolfgang .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (08) :1235-1247
[5]   How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Leca, Bernard ;
Boxenbaum, Eva .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2009, 3 :65-107
[6]   BUILDING BRIDGES FOR INNOVATION - THE ROLE OF CONSULTANTS IN TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER [J].
BESSANT, J ;
RUSH, H .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1995, 24 (01) :97-114
[7]   Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy [J].
Boon, Wouter ;
Edler, Jakob .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 45 (04) :435-447
[8]   Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers? [J].
Boon, Wouter P. C. ;
Moors, Ellen H. M. ;
Kuhlmann, Stefan ;
Smits, Ruud E. H. M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (02) :242-252
[9]  
Brooke-Holland L., 2019, 08486 CBP HOUS COMM
[10]  
Brooke-Holland L., 2020, 08930 HOUS COMM LIB