BI-RADS CATEGORIES AND BREAST LESIONS CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIAGNOSTIC MODELS

被引:1
|
作者
Turk, F. [1 ]
Akkur, E. [2 ]
Erogul, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kirikkale Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Kirikkale, Turkiye
[2] Turkish Med & Med Devices Agcy, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] TOBB ETU Univ Econ & Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; BI-RADS; convolutional neural network; support vector machines;
D O I
10.14311/NNW.2023.33.023
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
According to BI-RADS criteria, radiologists evaluate mammography images, and breast lesions are classified as malignant or benign. In this retrospective study, an evaluation was made on 264 mammogram images of 139 patients. First, data augmentation was applied, and then the total number of images was increased to 565. Two computer-aided models were then designed to classify breast lesions and BI-RADS categories. The first of these models is the support vector machine (SVM) based model, and the second is the convolutional neural network (CNN) based model. The SVM-based model could classify BI-RADS categories and malignant-benign discrimination with an accuracy rate of 86.42% and 92.59%, respectively. On the other hand, the CNN-based model showed 79.01% and 83.95% accuracy for BI-RADS categories and malignant benign discrimination, respectively. These results showed that a well-designed machine learning-based classification model can give better results than a deep learning model. Additionally, it can be used as a secondary system for radiologists to differentiate breast lesions and BI-RADS lesion categories.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 432
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classification of mammographic lesions into BI-RADS™ shape categories using the Beamlet Transform
    Sampat, MP
    Bovik, AC
    Markey, MK
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: IMAGE PROCESSING, PT 1-3, 2005, 5747 : 16 - 25
  • [2] Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BI-RADS categories
    Richard Lederman
    Isaac Leichter
    Shalom Buchbinder
    Boris Novak
    Philippe Bamberger
    Scott Fields
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 347 - 353
  • [3] Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BI-RADS categories
    Lederman, R
    Leichter, I
    Buchbinder, S
    Novak, B
    Bamberger, P
    Fields, S
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 347 - 353
  • [4] Automated classification of mammographic microcalcifications by using artificial neural network and ACR BI-RADS criteria
    Hara, T
    Yamada, A
    Fujita, H
    Iwase, T
    Endo, T
    MEDICAL IMAGING: 2001: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2001, 4322 : 1783 - 1787
  • [5] Malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 mammographic lesions
    Hall, FM
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 918 - 919
  • [6] The Role of Mammographic Breast Area/Microcalcification Cluster Area (BA/MCA) Ratio in the Classification of BI-RADS 4 Lesions: A Step for Development of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Patients
    Bahcecioglu, Ibrahim Burak
    Morkavuk, Sevket Baris
    Cimen, Sebnem
    Turan, Mujdat
    Cetinkaya, Gokay
    Gulcelik, Mehmet Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 2024
  • [7] Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence automatic detection systems for breast BI-RADS 4 nodules
    Shu-Yi Lyu
    Yan Zhang
    Mei-Wu Zhang
    Bai-Song Zhang
    Li-Bo Gao
    Lang-Tao Bai
    Jue Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (02) : 518 - 527
  • [8] Mammographic mass classification according to Bi-RADS lexicon
    Chokri, Ferkous
    Farida, Merouani Hayet
    IET COMPUTER VISION, 2017, 11 (03) : 189 - 198
  • [9] Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence automatic detection systems for breast BI-RADS 4 nodules
    Lyu, Shu-Yi
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Mei-Wu
    Zhang, Bai-Song
    Gao, Li-Bo
    Bai, Lang-Tao
    Wang, Jue
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (02) : 518 - 527
  • [10] Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories
    Ciatto, S
    Houssami, N
    Apruzzese, A
    Bassetti, E
    Brancato, B
    Carozzi, F
    Catarzi, S
    Lamberini, MP
    Marcelli, G
    Pellizzoni, R
    Pesce, B
    Risso, G
    Russo, F
    Scorsolini, A
    BREAST, 2005, 14 (04): : 269 - 275