Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

被引:4
|
作者
Rundle, Kiata [1 ]
Curtis, Guy J. [2 ]
Clare, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Law, Discipline Psychol, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; Reasons; Personality; Individual differences; Autonomy; Grit; Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Norms; Motivation; DARK TRIAD; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-INTEGRITY; RATIONAL CHOICE; DIRTY DOZEN; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; MORALITY; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00132-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating - students outsourcing assignments to ghost-writers and submitting it as their own - is an issue facing tertiary education institutions globally. Approximately 3% to 11% of higher education students may engage on contract cheating. Understanding why nearly 90% of students do not engage in contract cheating is as important as understanding why other students do, as it can aid in the development of effective interventions and policies. This study addressed limitations in previous research and built upon a measure of Reasons for Not Contract Cheating (RNCC). In this study, 403 university students participated in an online survey consisting of a revised version of the Reasons for Not Contract Cheating measure (RNCC-R) and measures of psychological individual differences, such as the dark triad personality traits, self-control, and autonomy. Two higher-order factors and six sub-factors were identified in the RNCC-R, which included some similarities to the original RNCC. The findings from this study demonstrate the importance of psychological individual differences, such as satisfaction of the need for autonomy, grit (perseverance of effort), and Machiavellianism, in predicting the reasons why students do not engage in contract cheating. Consistent with previous research, this study provides support for the importance of students' motivation for learning, and their perceived morals and norms, as reasons for not engaging in contract cheating. It additionally provides evidence of the importance of the academic environment, such as respect for academic staff, as a reason why students do not engage in contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why do French students like fieldwork?
    Chalmeau, Raphael
    Julien, Marie-Pierre
    JOURNAL OF ADVENTURE EDUCATION AND OUTDOOR LEARNING, 2023, 23 (04) : 525 - 540
  • [42] School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship?
    Joacim Ramberg
    Bitte Modin
    Social Psychology of Education, 2019, 22 : 517 - 538
  • [43] School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students' grades and moral standards matter for this relationship?
    Ramberg, Joacim
    Modin, Bitte
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2019, 22 (03) : 517 - 538
  • [44] Why young people do things for the environment: The role of parenting for adolescents' motivation to engage in pro-environmental behaviour
    Gronhoj, Alice
    Thogersen, John
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 54 : 11 - 19
  • [45] Why do students change their learning approaches? A mixed-methods study
    Xie, Qiuzhi
    Zhang, Li-fang
    King, Ronnel B.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 42 (09) : 1089 - 1108
  • [46] Why do teaching students choose the teaching career?
    Gomez-Goncalves, Alejandro
    Corrochano Fernandez, Diego
    Sanchez-Barbero, Beatriz
    Martin-Pastor, Elena
    AULA ABIERTA, 2022, 51 (04) : 395 - 405
  • [47] Why do students disengage from online courses?
    Akar, Sacide Guezin Mazman
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 62
  • [48] Why do teens abandon bicycling? A retrospective look at attitudes and behaviors
    Underwood, Sarah K.
    Handy, Susan L.
    Paterniti, Debora A.
    Lee, Amy E.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2014, 1 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [49] Effects of primer podcasts on stimulating learning from lectures: How do students engage?
    Popova, Anguelina
    Kirschner, Paul A.
    Joiner, Richard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 45 (02) : 330 - 339
  • [50] Students Can (Mostly) Recognize Effective Learning, So Why Do They Not Do It?
    Rea, Stephany Duany
    Wang, Lisi
    Muenks, Katherine
    Yan, Veronica X. X.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 10 (04)