Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

被引:4
|
作者
Rundle, Kiata [1 ]
Curtis, Guy J. [2 ]
Clare, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Law, Discipline Psychol, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; Reasons; Personality; Individual differences; Autonomy; Grit; Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Norms; Motivation; DARK TRIAD; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-INTEGRITY; RATIONAL CHOICE; DIRTY DOZEN; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; MORALITY; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00132-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating - students outsourcing assignments to ghost-writers and submitting it as their own - is an issue facing tertiary education institutions globally. Approximately 3% to 11% of higher education students may engage on contract cheating. Understanding why nearly 90% of students do not engage in contract cheating is as important as understanding why other students do, as it can aid in the development of effective interventions and policies. This study addressed limitations in previous research and built upon a measure of Reasons for Not Contract Cheating (RNCC). In this study, 403 university students participated in an online survey consisting of a revised version of the Reasons for Not Contract Cheating measure (RNCC-R) and measures of psychological individual differences, such as the dark triad personality traits, self-control, and autonomy. Two higher-order factors and six sub-factors were identified in the RNCC-R, which included some similarities to the original RNCC. The findings from this study demonstrate the importance of psychological individual differences, such as satisfaction of the need for autonomy, grit (perseverance of effort), and Machiavellianism, in predicting the reasons why students do not engage in contract cheating. Consistent with previous research, this study provides support for the importance of students' motivation for learning, and their perceived morals and norms, as reasons for not engaging in contract cheating. It additionally provides evidence of the importance of the academic environment, such as respect for academic staff, as a reason why students do not engage in contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look
    Kiata Rundle
    Guy J. Curtis
    Joseph Clare
    International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19
  • [2] Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating
    Rundle, Kiata
    Curtis, Guy J.
    Clare, Joseph
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students
    Bretag, Tracey
    Harper, Rowena
    Burton, Michael
    Ellis, Cath
    Newton, Philip
    Rozenberg, Pearl
    Saddiqui, Sonia
    van Haeringen, Karen
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) : 1837 - 1856
  • [4] A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school
    Runco, Mark A.
    Acar, Selcuk
    Cayirdag, Nur
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2017, 24 : 242 - 249
  • [5] Contract Cheating and Ghostwriting among University Students in Health Specialties
    Hamza, Muaawia A.
    Al Assadi, Faisal R.
    Khojah, Abdulaziz A.
    AlHanaki, Renad M.
    Alotaibi, Nour T.
    Kheimi, Rawan M.
    Salem, Abdullah H.
    Marar, Sumayyia D.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 17 (05) : 536 - 544
  • [6] University students' understanding of contract cheating: a qualitative case study in Kuwait
    Erguvan, Inan Deniz
    LANGUAGE TESTING IN ASIA, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] 'Mess, stress and trauma': students' experiences of formal contract cheating processes
    Pitt, Penelope
    Dullaghan, Kevin
    Sutherland-Smith, Wendy
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (04) : 659 - 672
  • [8] How Prevalent is Contract Cheating and to What Extent are Students Repeat Offenders?
    Curtis G.J.
    Clare J.
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2017, 15 (2) : 115 - 124
  • [9] University students’ understanding of contract cheating: a qualitative case study in Kuwait
    Inan Deniz Erguvan
    Language Testing in Asia, 12
  • [10] CONTRACT CHEATING: WHAT DO STUDENT ADVOCATES THINK?
    Sutherland-Smith, Wendy
    Dawson, Phillip
    Walker, Helen
    PLAGIARISM ACROSS EUROPE AND BEYOND 2017, 2017, : 230 - 230