Using just a canopy height model to obtain lidar-level accuracy in 3D forest canopy shortwave transmissivity estimates

被引:7
作者
Webster, Clare [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Essery, Richard [4 ]
Mazzotti, Giulia [2 ,5 ]
Jonas, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[2] WSL Inst Snow & Avalanche Res SLF, Davos, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Forest, Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Univ Toulouse, Ctr Etud Neige, Meteo France,CNRS,CNRM, Grenoble, France
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Shortwave radiation modelling; Radiation transfer; Canopy height model; Airborne lidar; Hemispherical photography; Synthetic hemispheric images; SOLAR-RADIATION; IRRADIANCE; SNOWMELT;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study presents a new model for calculating canopy shortwave radiation transmissivity from synthetic hemispheric images using only information contained within a canopy height model (CHM) - Can-opyHeightModel2Radiation (C2R). The enhanced version calculates synthetic hemispherical images based on the geometric arrangement of the surrounding canopy while applying a statistical correction for canopy trans-missivity using canopy thickness and tree species leaf area. The simple input data and statistical correction make this model suitable for estimating canopy transmissivity across large spatial extents typical of land surface models for which canopy transmissivity or radiation is a primary input variable. Performance of C2R-enhanced is assessed against hemispherical photographs, and compared to a basic version of C2R without transmissivity correction, and two versions of a Lidar2Radiation model (L2R-enhanced, L2R-basic) with either a basic repre-sentation of canopy structure or an enhanced representation including trunks and branches within tree crowns. The two enhanced models (L2R-enhanced and C2R-enhanced) perform best compared to hemispherical photo-graphs, while the L2R-basic and C2R-basic models over-and underestimate canopy transmissivity, respectively. At 1-meter and 10-minute resolution, the two enhanced models perform similarly, but exact timing and location of transmissivity controlled by canopy structure is better represented in the physically explicit L2R-enhanced model. Across hourly and 25 x 25 m grid-averaged scales, both enhanced models achieve similar estimates of canopy transmissivity. Based on these results, it is recommended that the purely physically-based representation in the L2R-enhanced model is used when estimates of canopy transmissivity at high spatial and temporal (meter and minute) resolutions are necessary, while the computationally more efficient C2R-enhanced model is used when calculating canopy transmissivity within spatially aggregated grid cells, for example, as input into coarser -resolution land surface models. Incorporating C2R-enhanced into existing forest energy balance models creates exciting opportunities for investigating forest structure changes on forest hydrology and ecosystems across previously impossible spatial extents.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] On measuring and modeling energy fluxes above the floor of a homogeneous and heterogeneous conifer forest
    Baldocchi, DD
    Law, BE
    Anthoni, PM
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2000, 102 (2-3) : 187 - 206
  • [2] Soil Moisture Response to Snowmelt and Rainfall in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-Conifer Forest
    Bales, Roger C.
    Hopmans, Jan W.
    O'Geen, Anthony T.
    Meadows, Matthew
    Hartsough, Peter C.
    Kirchner, Peter
    Hunsaker, Carolyn T.
    Beaudette, Dylan
    [J]. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2011, 10 (03) : 786 - 799
  • [3] Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian land surface scheme: Model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands
    Bartlett, Paul A.
    MacKay, Murray D.
    Verseghy, Diana L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2006, 44 (03) : 207 - 222
  • [4] Subcanopy Solar Radiation model: Predicting solar radiation across a heavily vegetated landscape using LiDAR and GIS solar radiation models
    Bode, Collin A.
    Limm, Michael P.
    Power, Mary E.
    Finlay, Jacques C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 154 : 387 - 397
  • [5] Quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on snow accumulation and ablation in mixed-conifer forests
    Broxton, P. D.
    Harpold, A. A.
    Biederman, J. A.
    Troch, P. A.
    Molotch, N. P.
    Brooks, P. D.
    [J]. ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) : 1073 - 1094
  • [6] Accounting for Fine-Scale Forest Structure is Necessary to Model Snowpack Mass and Energy Budgets in Montane Forests
    Broxton, Patrick D.
    Moeser, C. David
    Harpold, Adrian
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 57 (12)
  • [7] A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Nijssen, Bart
    Lundquist, Jessica D.
    Kavetski, Dmitri
    Rupp, David E.
    Woods, Ross A.
    Freer, Jim E.
    Gutmann, Ethan D.
    Wood, Andrew W.
    Gochis, David J.
    Rasmussen, Roy M.
    Tarboton, David G.
    Mahat, Vinod
    Flerchinger, Gerald N.
    Marks, Danny G.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (04) : 2515 - 2542
  • [8] The impact of forest-controlled snow variability on late-season streamflow varies by climatic region and forest structure
    Currier, William Ryan
    Sun, Ning
    Wigmosta, Mark
    Cristea, Nicoleta
    Lundquist, Jessica D.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2022, 36 (06)
  • [9] Comparing Aerial Lidar Observations With Terrestrial Lidar and Snow-Probe Transects From NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign
    Currier, William Ryan
    Pflug, Justin
    Mazzotti, Giulia
    Jonas, Tobias
    Deems, Jeffrey S.
    Bormann, Kat J.
    Painter, Thomas H.
    Hiemstra, Christopher A.
    Gelvin, Arthur
    Uhlmann, Zach
    Spaete, Lucas
    Glenn, Nancy F.
    Lundquist, Jessica D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (07) : 6285 - 6294
  • [10] Tree-centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data
    Dalponte, Michele
    Coomes, David A.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 7 (10): : 1236 - 1245