Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Severe In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Outcomes and Review of Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Jeong-Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jonguk [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Do Yeon [4 ]
Kim, Jun Yup [4 ]
Baik, Sung Hyun [5 ]
Kang, Jihoon [4 ]
Kim, Beom Joon [4 ]
Bae, Hee-Joon [4 ]
Jung, Cheolkyu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Seoul Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Translat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inha Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Incheon, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 82 Gumi ro 173beon gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
关键词
Carotid artery stenosis; Balloon angioplasty; Endovascular procedure; Stent; RECURRENT STENOSIS; ENDARTERECTOMY; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5469/neuroint.2024.00010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Cutting balloon-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (CB-PTA) is a feasible treatment option for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the longterm durability and safety of CB-PTA for ISR after CAS have not been well established. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with ISR after CAS who had been treated with CB-PTA from 2012 to 2021 in our center. Detailed information of baseline characteristics, periprocedural and long-term outcomes, and follow-up imaging was collected. Results: During 2012-2021, a total of 301 patients underwent CAS. Of which, CB-PTA was performed on 20 lesions exhibiting severe ISR in 18 patients following CAS. No patient had any history of receiving carotid endarterectomy or radiation therapy. These lesions were located at the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery (n=16), proximal external carotid artery (n=1), and distal common carotid artery (n=1). The median time interval between initial CAS and detection of ISR was 390 days (interquartile range 324-666 days). The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 9 years with a median value of 21 months. Four patients (22.2%) were symptomatic. The average of stenotic degree before and after the procedure was 79.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Out of the 18 patients receiving CB-PTA, 16 (88.9%) did not require additional stenting, and 16 (88.9%) did not experience recurrent ISR during the follow-up period. Two patients who experienced recurrent ISR were successfully treated with CB-PTA and additional stenting. No periprocedural complication was observed in any case. Conclusion: Regarding favorable periprocedural and long-term outcomes in our single-center experience, CB-PTA was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of severe ISR after CAS.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inflammation and In-Stent Restenosis: The Role of Serum Markers and Stent Characteristics in Carotid Artery Stenting
    Wasser, Katrin
    Schnaudigel, Sonja
    Wohlfahrt, Janin
    Psychogios, Marios-Nikos
    Knauth, Michael
    Groeschel, Klaus
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07):
  • [42] Mechanisms of balloon angioplasty and repeat stenting in patients with drug-eluting in-stent restenosis
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Sandoval, Jorge
    Perez-Vizcayno, Maria J.
    Cardenas, Alberto
    Gonzalo, Nieves
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Ibanez, Borja
    Nunez-Gil, Ivan
    Rivero, Fernando
    Escaned, Javier
    Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio
    Macaya, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 178 : 213 - 220
  • [43] Endovascular Stenting for Restenosis of the Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery After Balloon Angioplasty: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature
    Hiro Kiyosue
    Mika Okahara
    Masanori Yamashita
    Hirofumi Nagatomi
    Natsuki Nakamura
    Hiromu Mori
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2004, 27 : 538 - 543
  • [44] Endovascular stenting for restenosis of the intracranial vertebrobasilar artery after balloon angioplasty: Two case reports and review of the literature
    Kiyosue, H
    Okahara, M
    Yamashita, M
    Nagatomi, H
    Nakamura, N
    Mori, H
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (05) : 538 - 543
  • [45] Refractory In-stent Restenosis Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and Review of Operative Management
    King, Brian N.
    Scher, Larry A.
    Lipsitz, Evan C.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 43 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [46] Coronary stent strut avulsion in aorto-ostial in-stent restenosis: Potential complication after cutting balloon angioplasty
    Wang, HJ
    Kao, HL
    Liau, CS
    Lee, YT
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 56 (02) : 215 - 219
  • [47] Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study
    Katrin Wasser
    André Karch
    Sonja Gröschel
    Janin Witzenhausen
    Klaus Gröschel
    Mathias Bähr
    Jan Liman
    BMC Neurology, 13
  • [48] Evaluation of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting with superb microvascular imaging: initial findings
    Keskin, Berna
    Conkbayir, Isik
    Birgi, Erdem
    Ergun, Onur
    Hekimoglu, Azad
    Tangobay, Erdi
    Hekimoglu, Baki
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2025, : 434 - 440
  • [49] Increased Serum CRP-Albumin Ratio is Independently Associated With In-Stent Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting
    Durmus, Gunduz
    Karatas, Mehmet Baran
    Gokalp, Murat
    Eren, Semih
    Cebeci, Ahmet Ceyhun
    Nural, Ali
    Hatipoglu, Elif
    Osken, Altug
    Karaca, Mehmet
    Zengin, Ahmet
    ANGIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [50] Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and repeated carotid angioplasty and stenting for in-stent restenosis (CERCAS trial): a randomised study
    Hrbac, Tomas
    Fiedler, Jiri
    Prochazka, Vaclav
    Jonszta, Tomas
    Roubec, Martin
    Pakizer, David
    Vaclavik, Daniel
    Netuka, David
    Heryan, Tomas
    Skoloudik, David
    STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2023, 8 (05) : 399 - 404