Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland

被引:5
作者
Haner, Jonas D. [1 ]
Raber, Lorenz [1 ]
Moro, Christina [1 ]
Losdat, Sylvain [2 ]
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, CTU Bern, Bern, Switzerland
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention; procedural success; manual assistance; manual conversion; Swiss experience; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1294930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims of the study: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exposes operators to ionizing radiation. Robotic-assisted PCI (RA-PCI) is a novel technology that enables interventional cardiologists to operate coronary devices remotely from a radiation-shed cockpit. The aim of this study is to describe the experience and challenges during the initiation of a RA-PCI program and to report outcomes of the first 21 patients undergoing RA-PCI in Switzerland.Methods: All patients undergoing RA-PCI using the CorPath GRX Vascular Robotic System between 06/2021 and 12/2021 at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital were included in this retrospective registry study. Baseline, procedural and clinical follow-up data were prospectively assessed as part of the Cardiobase Bern PCI registry (NCT02241291). The two endpoints of interest were clinical success [defined as <30% residual diameter stenosis in the absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke)] and robotic success (defined as clinical success and completion of RA-PCI without or with partial manual assistance). Additional outcome measures include clinical long-term outcomes at one year.Results: Twenty-five lesions in 21 patients were treated with RA-PCI (age 62.4 +/- 9.1 years, 24% female). Clinical success was achieved in 100%, and robotic success in 81% (17/21 procedures, including 4 procedures requiring partial manual assistance). Manual conversion (e.g. manual completion of the procedure) occurred in 19% (4 procedures). Reasons for manual assistance or conversion were poor guiding-catheter back-up or platform limitations (4), adverse events (2x transient slow-flow that was solved manually), safety decision (1x vasovagal reaction not related to robotic approach), and software error (1). No in-hospital MACE occurred. During 12 months of follow-up, one patient suffered a non-target-vessel myocardial infarction requiring repeat PCI.Conclusions: RA-PCI can safely be performed without clinically relevant robot-associated complications in selected patients with approximately 80% of procedures conducted without or with partial manual assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] Mangels D, 2020, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V32, pE321, DOI 10.25270/jic/20.00212
  • [12] Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization An Expert Consensus Document From the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)
    Moussa, Issam D.
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    Shah, Binita
    Mehran, Roxana
    Mack, Michael J.
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Reilly, John P.
    Zoghbi, Gilbert
    Holper, Elizabeth
    Stone, Gregg W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (17) : 1563 - 1570
  • [13] The evolving use of robotic surgery: a population-based analysis
    Muaddi, Hala
    Stukel, Therese A.
    de Mestral, Charles
    Nathens, Avery
    Pautler, Stephen E.
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Hanna, Wael C.
    Schlachta, Christopher M.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Hopkins, Laura
    Jackson, Timothy D.
    Karanicolas, Paul J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (03): : 1870 - 1877
  • [14] Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open) A Systematic Overview of Reviews
    Muaddi, Hala
    El Hafid, Melanie
    Choi, Woo Jin
    Lillie, Erin
    de Mestral, Charles
    Nathens, Avery
    Stukel, Therese A.
    Karanicolas, Paul J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [15] Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort
    Patel, Tejas M.
    Shah, Sanjay C.
    Soni, Yash Y.
    Radadiya, Rajni C.
    Patel, Gaurav A.
    Tiwari, Pradyot O.
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [16] Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience
    Patel, Tejas M.
    Shah, Sanjay C.
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    [J]. ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2019, 14 : 53 - 58
  • [17] Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance
    Sardar, Partha
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Kundu, Amartya
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Granada, Juan F.
    Giri, Jay
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (14) : 1293 - 1303
  • [18] Techniques to Overcome the Pushability of Robotic-Assisted PCI
    Schoff, Krista
    Chan, Albert
    Karuparthi, Poorna R.
    Hirai, Taishi
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 53 : S267 - S270
  • [19] Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures
    Sheetz, Kyle H.
    Claflin, Jake
    Dimick, Justin B.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [20] Smitson CC, 2018, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V30, P152