Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland

被引:5
作者
Haner, Jonas D. [1 ]
Raber, Lorenz [1 ]
Moro, Christina [1 ]
Losdat, Sylvain [2 ]
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, CTU Bern, Bern, Switzerland
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention; procedural success; manual assistance; manual conversion; Swiss experience; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1294930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims of the study: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exposes operators to ionizing radiation. Robotic-assisted PCI (RA-PCI) is a novel technology that enables interventional cardiologists to operate coronary devices remotely from a radiation-shed cockpit. The aim of this study is to describe the experience and challenges during the initiation of a RA-PCI program and to report outcomes of the first 21 patients undergoing RA-PCI in Switzerland.Methods: All patients undergoing RA-PCI using the CorPath GRX Vascular Robotic System between 06/2021 and 12/2021 at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital were included in this retrospective registry study. Baseline, procedural and clinical follow-up data were prospectively assessed as part of the Cardiobase Bern PCI registry (NCT02241291). The two endpoints of interest were clinical success [defined as <30% residual diameter stenosis in the absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke)] and robotic success (defined as clinical success and completion of RA-PCI without or with partial manual assistance). Additional outcome measures include clinical long-term outcomes at one year.Results: Twenty-five lesions in 21 patients were treated with RA-PCI (age 62.4 +/- 9.1 years, 24% female). Clinical success was achieved in 100%, and robotic success in 81% (17/21 procedures, including 4 procedures requiring partial manual assistance). Manual conversion (e.g. manual completion of the procedure) occurred in 19% (4 procedures). Reasons for manual assistance or conversion were poor guiding-catheter back-up or platform limitations (4), adverse events (2x transient slow-flow that was solved manually), safety decision (1x vasovagal reaction not related to robotic approach), and software error (1). No in-hospital MACE occurred. During 12 months of follow-up, one patient suffered a non-target-vessel myocardial infarction requiring repeat PCI.Conclusions: RA-PCI can safely be performed without clinically relevant robot-associated complications in selected patients with approximately 80% of procedures conducted without or with partial manual assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Bezerra, Hiram G.
    Mehanna, Emile
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Costa, Marco A.
    Weisz, Giora
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (05) : 449 - 455
  • [2] Establishing a robotic-assisted PCI program: experiences at a large tertiary referral center
    Brunner, Fabian J.
    Waldeyer, Christoph
    Zengin-Sahm, Elvin
    Kondziella, Christoph
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Westermann, Dirk
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Seiffert, Moritz
    [J]. HEART AND VESSELS, 2022, 37 (10) : 1669 - 1678
  • [3] Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program
    Chitturi, Kalyan R.
    Kanake, Shubham
    Nguyen, Thai
    Loc, Brian
    Baden, Kristina
    Bavishi, Chirag
    Kumar, Arun
    Liu, Zhenguo
    Chan, Albert
    Karuparthi, Poorna R.
    Hirai, Taishi
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 43 : 115 - 119
  • [4] Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion
    Harrison, Jonathan
    Ang, Lawrence
    Naghi, Jesse
    Behnamfar, Omid
    Pourdjabbar, Ali
    Patel, Mitul P.
    Reeves, Ryan R.
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 526 - 531
  • [5] Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center
    Kagiyama, Kotaro
    Mitsutake, Yoshiaki
    Ueno, Takafumi
    Sakai, Shinji
    Nakamura, Takuya
    Yamaji, Kazunori
    Ishimatsu, Takashi
    Sasaki, Masahiro
    Chibana, Hidetoshi
    Itaya, Naoki
    Sasaki, Ken-ichiro
    Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
    [J]. HEART AND VESSELS, 2021, 36 (07) : 955 - 964
  • [6] Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: Results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    Tra, Yolande
    Garratt, Kirk N.
    Powell, Wayne
    Lopez-Cruz, Georgina
    Chambers, Charles
    Goldstein, James A.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 86 (05) : 913 - 924
  • [7] Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance
    Koeda, Yorihiko
    Ishida, Masaru
    Sasaki, Koto
    Kikuchi, Sayaka
    Yamaya, Shohei
    Tsuji, Keiko
    Ishisone, Takenori
    Goto, Iwao
    Kimura, Takumi
    Shimoda, Yudai
    Doi, Akio
    Morino, Yoshihiro
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 38 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [8] Safety and effectiveness of introducing a robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention program in a tertiary center: a prospective study
    Lemos, Pedro A.
    Franken, Marcelo
    Mariani Jr, Jose
    Caixeta, Adriano
    Almeida, Breno O.
    Pitta, Fabio G.
    Prado, Guy F. A.
    Garzon, Stefano
    Ramalho, Felipe
    Albuquerque, Gabriel
    Gomes, Ivanise M.
    de Oliveira, Irisvaldo S.
    Valle, Leonardo
    Galastri, Leonardo
    Affonso, Breno B.
    Nasser, Felipe
    Garcia, Rodrigo G.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2022, 12 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [9] Madder RD, 2017, CARDIOVASC REVASCULA, V18, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.011
  • [10] Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    Naghi, Jesse
    Ang, Lawrence
    Harrison, Jonathan
    Behnamfar, Omid
    Pourdjabbar, Ali
    Reeves, Ryan
    Patel, Mitul
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (13) : 1320 - 1327