Adjoint-state differential arrival time tomography

被引:7
|
作者
Tong, Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Tianjue [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Nagaso, Masaru [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Phys & Math Sci, Div Math Sci, Singapore 637371, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Asian Sch Environm, Singapore 639788, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Earth Observ Singapore, Singapore 639788, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Inverse theory; Seismic tomography; Wave propagation; EARTHQUAKE LOCATION ALGORITHM; CALIFORNIA PLATE-BOUNDARY; FAST SWEEPING METHOD; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; HAYWARD FAULT; BENEATH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggad416
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The recently developed adjoint-state traveltime tomography (ATT) method offers an alternative approach to conduct traveltime tomography without the need for ray tracing or waveform modelling. Instead, it utilizes the eikonal equation to depict the minimal traveltime field from an earthquake location to any position in the computational domain. The process of tomographic inversion is formulated as an optimization problem with the goal of minimizing the difference between observed and theoretical first arrival times, which is subsequently solved using the efficient adjoint method. One advantage of differential arrival time data is that it cancels or reduces the influence of common factors, making it more sensitive to a specific subset of model parameters compared to first arrival times. To take advantage of this property, two variants of the ATT method are derived to determine velocity structure and earthquake locations in this study. The first variant, adjoint-state common-source differential arrival time tomography (ATT-CS), uses common-source differential arrival times; while the second variant, adjoint-state common-receiver differential arrival time tomography (ATT-CR), inverts common-receiver differential arrival times. Numerical examples demonstrate that the ATT-CS method is a valuable tool for imaging receiver-side fine-scale velocity structures. Conversely, the ATT-CR method is well suited for resolving source-side velocity structures. Differential arrival times also place constraints on earthquake locations. Compared to common-source differential arrival times, common-receiver differential arrival times are less sensitive to velocity errors and suitable for earthquake location determination. Both common-source and common-receiver differential arrival times are considered first-order differential arrival times. To demonstrate the ease with which the ATT method can be extended to higher-order differential arrival times, we also derive the adjoint-state second-order differential arrival time tomography method. Finally, we discuss how the adjoint-state tomography methods address multipathing.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 160
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Joint microseismic location and anisotropic tomography using differential arrival times and differential backazimuths
    Li, Junlun
    Zhang, Haijiang
    Rodi, William L.
    Toksoz, M. Nafi
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 195 (03) : 1917 - 1931
  • [22] Constrained non-linear AVO inversion based on the adjoint-state optimization
    Ahmed, Nisar
    Weibull, Wiktor Waldemar
    Grana, Dario
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 168
  • [23] Balancing unevenly distributed data in seismic tomography: a global adjoint tomography example
    Ruan, Youyi
    Lei, Wenjie
    Modrak, Ryan
    Orsvuran, Ridvan
    Bozdag, Ebru
    Tromp, Jeroen
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 219 (02) : 1225 - 1236
  • [24] Adjoint tomography of the italian lithosphere
    Magnoni, Federica
    Casarotti, Emanuele
    Komatitsch, Dimitri
    Di Stefano, Raffaele
    Ciaccio, Maria Grazia
    Tape, Carl
    Melini, Daniele
    Michelini, Alberto
    Piersanti, Antonio
    Tromp, Jeroen
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [25] Elastic and anelastic adjoint tomography with and full Hessian kernels
    Xie, Yujiang
    Rychert, Catherine A.
    Harmon, Nicholas
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 234 (02) : 1205 - 1235
  • [26] A fast local level set adjoint state method for first arrival transmission traveltime tomography with discontinuous slowness
    Li, Wenbin
    Leung, Shingyu
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 195 (01) : 582 - 596
  • [27] Relative arrival-time upper-mantle tomography and the elusive background mean
    Bastow, Ian D.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 190 (02) : 1271 - 1278
  • [28] Converted wave tomography based on inverse level set and adjoint formulation
    Nino, C. A.
    Duarte, C.
    Agudelo, W.
    Sierra, D. A.
    Sacchi, M. D.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 238 (01) : 459 - 484
  • [29] Global adjoint tomography-model GLAD-M25
    Lei, Wenjie
    Ruan, Youyi
    Bozdag, Ebru
    Peter, Daniel
    Lefebvre, Matthieu
    Komatitsch, Dimitri
    Tromp, Jeroen
    Hill, Judith
    Podhorszki, Norbert
    Pugmire, David
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 223 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [30] Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based on spectral-element and adjoint methods
    Tape, Carl
    Liu, Qinya
    Maggi, Alessia
    Tromp, Jeroen
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 180 (01) : 433 - 462