Status indicators in software engineering group projects

被引:0
作者
Isomottonen, Ville [1 ]
Taipalus, Toni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Informat Technol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
Group work; Status concept; Higher education; TEAM EFFECTIVENESS; WORK; PERSONALITY; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2023.111612
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A segment of studies on group structure and performance in software engineering (SE) project-based learning (PjBL) have focused on roles, including studies that use Belbin team roles and studies that address problematic roles such as social loafing. The present study focuses on the status, which is basically missing in SE PjBL studies, although relating to roles. The study investigates the aspects that students identified as indicators of rising or declining status in their project groups. The status theory was utilized as the framework that motivated the research and on which the results were reflected. An inductive qualitative content analysis was applied to learning reports in which students reflected on their statuses. The indicators of rising status included technical know-how, commitment, management responsibility, and idea ownership, while also group-level attributes such as a caring atmosphere and joint responsibility. The indicators of a declining status included aspects that appear as counterparts of rising status indicators, while also more refined aspects such as no one willing to be a leader or study background. The results are concluded to provide material for educating students about intra-group relations and promoting self-regulation for fruitful collaboration in groups. The authors believe that the results also initiate further PjBL research in which status theory can be utilized. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Are team personality and climate related to satisfaction and software quality? Aggregating results from a twice replicated experiment [J].
Acuna, Silvia T. ;
Gomez, Marta N. ;
Hannay, Jo E. ;
Juristo, Natalia ;
Pfahl, Dietmar .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 57 :141-156
[2]   How do personality, team processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality? [J].
Acuna, Silvia T. ;
Gomez, Marta ;
Juristo, Natalia .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 51 (03) :627-639
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FIELD METHOD, DOI DOI 10.1177/1525822X0101300203
[4]  
Bach L., 2008, DIME CREATIVE IND IN
[5]  
Bales RobertF., 1950, INTERACTION PROCESS
[6]   Influence of Human Personality in Software Engineering A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Barroso, Anderson S. ;
Madureira da Silva, Jamille S. ;
Soares, Michel S. ;
do Nascimento, Rogerio P. C. .
ICEIS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS - VOL 3, 2017, :53-62
[7]  
Belbin R., 1981, Management teams: Why they succeed or fail
[8]  
Bell D, 2010, SIGMIS CPR '10: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 ACM SIGMIS COMPUTER PERSONNEL RESEARCH CONFERENCE, P43
[9]   Functional Roles of Group Members [J].
Benne, Kenneth D. ;
Sheats, Paul .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1948, 4 (02) :41-49
[10]  
Beranek G., 2005, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, V30, P1