Carbon emission reduction policy with privatization in an oligopoly model

被引:34
作者
Chen, Junlong [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Chaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yajie [3 ]
Liu, Jiali [4 ,5 ]
Zhou, Pin [6 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Humanities & Law, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao, Sch Econ, Qinhuangdao 066004, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Univ, Ctr China Publ Sect Econ Res, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[5] Jilin Univ, Sch Econ, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[6] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission reduction policy; Privatization; Oligopoly; Carbon emission trading price; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; TAX; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24256-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study constructs a mixed oligopoly model that includes a public enterprise and two private enterprises. Game theory was adopted to explore the effects of carbon emission reduction policies. In addition, this study analyzes the optimal carbon emission trading prices and privatization decisions. The results show that the proportion of state-owned shares and the equity efficiency gap affect the equilibrium results for different carbon emission policies. Privatization increases the profits of public firms but does not necessarily increase social welfare. Different carbon emission reduction policies have different effects on the equilibrium results. Moreover, the emission reduction target is not completely consistent with the maximum social welfare target and should be comprehensively considered. The government can intervene by setting carbon emission trading prices and making privatization decisions. Full and partial privatization may be optimal decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:45209 / 45230
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Joseph, Stephan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 :531-539
[2]   The constraints on full privatization: International evidence [J].
Boubakri, Narjess ;
Cosset, Jean-Claude ;
Saffar, Walid .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2017, 42 :392-407
[3]   Environmental policies with consumer-friendly firms and cross-ownership [J].
Carlos Barcena-Ruiz, Juan ;
Sagasta, Amagoia .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 103
[4]   Partial cross-ownership and strategic environmental policy [J].
Carlos Barcena-Ruiz, Juan ;
Luz Campo, Maria .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) :198-210
[5]   Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, Environment and Energy Policy [J].
Chao, Angela C. ;
Hong, Lucheng .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 51 :311-317
[6]   Technology R&D and sharing in carbon emission reduction in a duopoly [J].
Chen, Junlong ;
Sun, Chaoqun ;
Shi, Jiayan ;
Liu, Jiali .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 183
[7]   Privatization and efficiency: a mixed oligopoly approach [J].
Chen, Tai-Liang .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 120 (03) :251-268
[8]   Effects of carbon tax on environment under duopoly [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Nie, Pu-yan ;
Wang, Chan .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (09) :13490-13507
[9]   A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Wang, Chan ;
Nie, Pu-yan ;
Chen, Zi-rui .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29
[10]   The price discrimination and environmental effectiveness in carbon emission trading schemes: A theoretical approach [J].
Chen, Zhe ;
Su, Yue ;
Wang, Xue-ying ;
Wu, You .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 283