Wilding cities for biodiversity and people: a transdisciplinary framework

被引:4
作者
Bonthoux, Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
Chollet, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Ecole Nat & Paysage INSA CVL, UMR 7324, CITERES, 3 Rue Chocolaterie,Blois 23410, F-41034 Blois, France
[2] CITERES, LTSER, UMR 7324, BP 60449, F-37204 Tours 03, France
[3] Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6553, ECOBIO Ecosyst Biodivers Evolut, Campus Beaulie,Bat 14A,263 Av Gal Leclerc, F-35700 Rennes, France
关键词
rewilding; transdisciplinarity; urban landscape; conservation science; socio-ecological system; people-nature connection; urban biodiversity; nature experience; urban planning; urban design; URBAN GREEN-SPACE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SPONTANEOUS VEGETATION; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; RESIDENTS PERCEPTIONS; RELATIONAL VALUES; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/brv.13076
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Accelerating urbanisation and associated lifestyle changes result in loss of biodiversity and diminished wellbeing of people through fewer direct interactions and experiences with nature. In this review, we propose the notion of urban wilding (the promotion of autonomous ecological processes that are independent of historical land-use conditions, with minimal direct human maintenance and planting interventions) and investigate its propensity to improve biodiversity and people-nature connections in cities. Through a large interdisciplinary synthesis, we explore the ecological mechanisms through which urban wilding can promote biodiversity in cities, investigate the attitudes and relations of city dwellers towards urban wild spaces, and discuss the integration of urban wilding into the fabric of cities and its governance. We show that favouring assembly spontaneity by reducing planting interventions, and functional spontaneity by limiting maintenance practices, can promote plant diversity and provide ecological resources for numerous organisms at habitat and city scales. These processes could reverse biotic homogenisation, but further studies are needed to understand the effects of wilding on invasive species and their consequences. From a socio-ecological perspective, the attitudes of city dwellers towards spontaneous vegetation are modulated by successional stages, with grassland and woodland stages preferred, but dense shrubby vegetation stages disliked. Wild spaces can diversify physical interactions with nature, and enrich multi-sensory, affective and cognitive experiences of nature in cities. However, some aspects of wild spaces can cause anxiety, feeling unsafe, and the perception of abandonment. These negative attitudes could be mitigated by subtle design and maintenance interventions. While nature has long been thought of as ornamental and instrumental in cities, urban wilding could help to develop relational and intrinsic values of nature in the fabric of cities. Wildness and its singular aesthetics should be combined with cultural norms, resident uses and urban functions to plan and design urban spatial configurations promoting human-non-human cohabitation. For urban wilding to be socially just and adapted to the needs of residents, its implementation should be backed by inclusive governance opening up discussion forums to residents and urban workers. Scientists can support these changes by collaborating with urban actors to design and experiment with new wild spaces promoting biodiversity and wellbeing of people in cities.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1480
页数:23
相关论文
共 271 条
  • [1] Leverage points for sustainability transformation
    Abson, David J.
    Fischer, Joern
    Leventon, Julia
    Newig, Jens
    Schomerus, Thomas
    Vilsmaier, Ulli
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    Abernethy, Paivi
    Ives, Christopher D.
    Jager, Nicolas W.
    Lang, Daniel J.
    [J]. AMBIO, 2017, 46 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [2] Aggeri G., 2016, DEV DURABLE TERRITOI, V7
  • [3] Aggeri G., 2004, DOCTORAL DISSERTATIO
  • [4] The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation
    Ahern, Jack
    Cilliers, Sarel
    Niemela, Jari
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 : 254 - 259
  • [5] Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights
    Albert, Christian
    Brillinger, Mario
    Guerrero, Paulina
    Gottwald, Sarah
    Henze, Jennifer
    Schmidt, Stefan
    Ott, Edward
    Schroeter, Barbara
    [J]. AMBIO, 2021, 50 (08) : 1446 - 1461
  • [6] Not all types of nature have an equal effect on urban residents' well-being: A structural equation model approach
    Allard-Poesi, Florence
    Matos, Lorena B. S.
    Massu, Justine
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2022, 74
  • [7] Vacant lots: An underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities
    Anderson, Elsa C.
    Minor, Emily S.
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2017, 21 : 146 - 152
  • [8] Introducing rewilding to restoration to expand the conservation effort: a response to Hayward et al.
    Anderson, Robert M.
    Buitenwerf, Robert
    Driessen, Clemens
    Genes, Luisa
    Lorimer, Jamie
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 28 (13) : 3691 - 3693
  • [9] Predicting the assembly of novel communities in urban ecosystems
    Andrade, Riley
    Franklin, Janet
    Larson, Kelli L.
    Swan, Christopher M.
    Lerman, Susannah B.
    Bateman, Heather L.
    Warren, Paige S.
    York, Abigail
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    Lepczyk, Christopher A.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Goddard, Mark A.
    Lerman, Susannah B.
    MacIvor, J. Scott
    Nilon, Charles H.
    Vargo, Timothy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (04) : 189 - 196