A comparative trial of blood pressure monitoring in a self-care kiosk, in office, and with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

被引:1
作者
Nilsson, Gunnar [1 ]
Lindam, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, S-90581 Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Ostersund Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Unit Res Educ & Dev, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Ambulatory blood pressure; Self-blood pressure monitoring; Clinical trial; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12872-023-03701-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Automated measurement of blood pressure (BP) in designated BP kiosks have in recent years been introduced in primary care. If kiosk blood pressure (BP) monitoring provides results equivalent to in-office BP or daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), follow-up of adult patients could be managed primarily by self-checks. We therefore designed a comparative trial and evaluated the diagnostic performance of kiosk- and office-based BP (nurse- versus physician-measured) compared with daytime ABPM.Methods A trial of automated BP monitoring in three settings: a designated BP kiosk, by nurses and physicians in clinic, and by ABPM. The primary outcome was systolic and diastolic BP, with respective diagnostic thresholds of >= 135 mmHg and/or >= 85 mmHg for daytime ABPM and kiosk BP and >= 140 mmHg and/or >= 90 mmHg for office BP (nurse- and physician-measured).ResultsCompared with daytime ABPM, mean systolic kiosk BP was higher by 6.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-8.6) and diastolic by 7.9 mmHg (95% CI 6.2-9.6; p < 0.001). Mean systolic BP taken by nurses was similar to daytime ABPM values (+ 2.0 mmHg; 95% CI - 0.2-4.2; p = 0.071), but nurse-measured diastolic values were higher, by 7.2 mmHg (95% CI 5.9-9.6; p < 0.001). Mean systolic and diastolic physician-measured BPs were higher compared with daytime ABPM (systolic, by 7.6 mmHg [95% CI 4.5-10.2] and diastolic by 5.8 mmHg [95% CI 4.1-7.6]; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves of BP monitoring across pairs of systolic/diastolic cut-off levels among the three settings, with daytime ABPM as reference, demonstrated overall similar diagnostic performance between kiosk and nurse-measured values and over the curve performance for physician-measured BP. Accuracy with nurse-measured BP was 69.2% (95% CI 60.0-77.4%), compared with 65.8% (95% CI 56.5-74.3%) for kiosk BP.Conclusions In this study kiosk BP monitoring was not comparable to daytime ABPM but could be an alternative to in-office BP monitoring by trained nurses. The diagnostic performance of kiosk and nurse-measured BP monitoring was similar and better than that of physician-measured BP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The validity of blood pressure kiosk validation studies: a systematic review [J].
Al Hamarneh, Yazid N. ;
Houle, Sherilyn K. D. ;
Chatterley, Patricia ;
Tsuyuki, Ross T. .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (03) :167-172
[2]   Public-use blood pressure measurement: the kiosk quandary [J].
Alpert, Bruce S. ;
Dart, Richard A. ;
Sica, Domenic A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2014, 8 (10) :739-742
[3]   Are kiosk blood pressure readings trustworthy? [J].
Alpert, Bruce S. .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2012, 17 (06) :257-258
[4]   Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings [J].
Andreadis, Emmanuel A. ;
Geladari, Charalampia V. ;
Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T. ;
Savva, Florentia S. ;
Georgantoni, Anna I. ;
Papademetriou, Vasilios .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (08)
[5]   Trends in blood pressure, blood lipids, and smoking from 259 753 patients with hypertension in a Swedish primary care register: results from QregPV [J].
Bager, Johan-Emil ;
Mourtzinis, Georgios ;
Andersson, Tobias ;
Natman, Jonatan ;
Rosengren, Annika ;
Bjorck, Staffan ;
Manhem, Karin ;
Hjerpe, Per .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) :158-166
[6]   Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study [J].
Banegas, Jose R. ;
Lopez-Garcia, Esther ;
Dallongeville, Jean ;
Guallar, Eliseo ;
Halcox, Julian P. ;
Borghi, Claudio ;
Masso-Gonzalez, Elvira L. ;
Jimenez, Francisco J. ;
Perk, Joep ;
Gabriel Steg, Philippe ;
De Backer, Guy ;
Rodriguez-Artalejo, Fernando .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (17) :2143-2152
[7]  
Benavente OR, 2013, LANCET, V382, P506
[8]   Blood pressure readings using public kiosks or smart phone apps: Caveat emptor (for now) [J].
Cohen, Debbie L. ;
Townsend, Raymond R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (10) :946-947
[9]   Effects of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J].
Cushman, William C. ;
Evans, Gregory W. ;
Byington, Robert P. ;
Goff, David C., Jr. ;
Grimm, Richard H., Jr. ;
Cutler, Jeffrey A. ;
Simons-Morton, Denise G. ;
Basile, Jan N. ;
Corson, Marshall A. ;
Probstfield, Jeffrey L. ;
Katz, Lois ;
Peterson, Kevin A. ;
Friedewald, William T. ;
Buse, John B. ;
Bigger, J. Thomas ;
Gerstein, Hertzel C. ;
Ismail-Beigi, Faramarz .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (17) :1575-1585
[10]   The globalburden of hypertension exceeds 1.4 billion people: should a systolic blood pressure target below 130 become the universal standard? [J].
Egan, Brent M. ;
Kjeldsen, Sverre E. ;
Grassi, Guido ;
Esler, Murray ;
Mancia, Guiseppe .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2019, 37 (06) :1148-1153