Italian version of the Brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (Brief-IT-QOD) Versione italiana del brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (Brief-IT-QOD)

被引:2
作者
Cardella, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Riva, Giuseppe [3 ]
Preti, Andrea [1 ]
Albera, Andrea [3 ]
Luzi, Livio [2 ,4 ]
Albera, Roberto [3 ]
Cadei, Davide [1 ]
Motatto, Gian Marco [3 ]
Omenetti, Filippo [1 ]
Pecorari, Giancarlo [3 ]
Ottaviani, Francesco [1 ,5 ]
Mozzanica, Francesco [1 ,5 ]
Olfattivi, Disordini
机构
[1] Osped San Giuseppe, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, IRCCS Multimed, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Div Otorhinolaryngol, Turin, Italy
[4] IRCCS Multimed, Dept Endocrinol Nutr & Metab Dis, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy
关键词
olfaction disorders; questionnaire; quality of life; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; ODOR IDENTIFICATION; QUALITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.14639/0392-100X-N2212
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (Brief-IT-QOD). Methods. The study consisted of six phases: item generation, reliability analysis (112 dysosmic patients for internal consistency analysis and 61 for test-retest reliability analysis), normative data generation (303 normosmic subjects), validity analysis (comparison of Brief-IT-QOD scores of healthy and dysosmic subjects and scores correlation with psychophysical olfactory testing TDI and SNOT-22 scores), responsiveness analysis (10 dysosmic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients before and after biologic therapy), and cutoff value determination (ROC curve analysis of Brief-IT-QOD sensitivity and specificity). Results. All subjects completed the Brief-IT-QOD. Internal consistency (& alpha; > 0.70) and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.7) were acceptable and satisfactory for both questionnaire subscales. A significant difference between dysosmic and control subjects was found in both subscales (p < 0.05). Significant correlations between subscales scores and TDI and SNOT-22 scores were observed. Brief-IT-QOD scores before treatment were significantly higher than after biological therapy. Conclusions. Brief-IT-QOD is reliable, valid, responsive to changes in QoL, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 261
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [2] Translation and validation of the short version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements to Spanish
    Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    Calvo-Henriquez, Christian
    Mayo, Miguel
    Maldonado, Byron
    Maza, Juan
    Tucciarone, Manuel
    Villareal, Ithzel
    Vaira, Luigi Angelo
    Izquierdo-Dominguez, Adriana
    Alobid, Isam
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 42 (01)
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders
    Choi, Woo Ri
    Jeong, Hyeon-Yeong
    Kim, Ji Heui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (12) : 1481 - 1485
  • [4] Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life-An Updated Review
    Croy, Ilona
    Nordin, Steven
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2014, 39 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [5] An introduction to ROC analysis
    Fawcett, Tom
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (08) : 861 - 874
  • [6] Olfactory dysfunction and daily life
    Frasnelli, J
    Hummel, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 262 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [7] Methods for shortening patient-reported outcome measures
    Harel, Daphna
    Baron, Murray
    Hudson, M.
    Gyger, G.
    Pope, J.
    Larche, M.
    Khalidi, N.
    Masetto, A.
    Sutton, E.
    Robinson, D.
    Rodriguez-Reyna, T. S.
    Smith, D.
    Thorne, C.
    Fortin, P. R.
    Fritzler, M.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (10-11) : 2992 - 3011
  • [8] Hummel T, 2017, RHINOLOGY, V54, P7, DOI 10.4193/Rhino16.248
  • [9] 'Sniffin' Sticks': Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold
    Hummel, T
    Sekinger, B
    Wolf, SR
    Pauli, E
    Kobal, G
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1997, 22 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [10] Jalessi Maryam, 2017, Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, V29, P209