Classification of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Resident Space Objects' (RSO) Light Curves Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)

被引:10
作者
Qashoa, Randa [1 ]
Lee, Regina [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
resident space object; Space Situational Awareness; light curve; low Earth orbit; support vector machine; long short-term memory;
D O I
10.3390/s23146539
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Light curves are plots of brightness measured over time. In the field of Space Situational Awareness (SSA), light curves of Resident Space Objects (RSOs) can be utilized to infer information about an RSO such as the type of object, its attitude, and its shape. Light curves of RSOs in geostationary orbit (GEO) have been a main research focus for many years due to the availability of long time series data spanning hours. Given that a large portion of RSOs are in low Earth orbit (LEO), it is of great importance to study trends in LEO light curves as well. The challenge with LEO light curves is that they tend to be short, typically no longer than a few minutes, which makes them difficult to analyze with typical time series techniques. This study presents a novel approach to observational LEO light curve classification. We extract features from light curves using a wavelet scattering transformation which is used as an input for a machine learning classifier. We performed light curve classification using both a conventional machine learning approach, namely a support vector machine (SVM), and a deep learning technique, long short-term memory (LSTM), to compare the results. LSTM outperforms SVM for LEO light curve classification with a 92% accuracy. This proves the viability of RSO classification by object type and spin rate from real LEO light curves.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] An optimized model using LSTM network for demand forecasting
    Abbasimehr, Hossein
    Shabani, Mostafa
    Yousefi, Mohsen
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 143
  • [2] Adams R.P., 2012, 25 INT C NEURAL INFP, P2951, DOI DOI 10.5555/2999325.2999464.47
  • [3] Comparison of wavelet transform and FFT methods in the analysis of EEG signals
    Akin M.
    [J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 2002, 26 (3) : 241 - 247
  • [4] Allworth J., 2019, P INT ASTR C IAC WAS
  • [5] A transfer learning approach to space debris classification using observational light curve data
    Allworth, James
    Windrim, Lloyd
    Bennett, James
    Bryson, Mitch
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2021, 181 : 301 - 315
  • [6] Alpaydin E, 2014, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1
  • [7] Deep Scattering Spectrum
    Anden, Joakim
    Mallat, Stephane
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 62 (16) : 4114 - 4128
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, P NIPS WORKSH BAYES
  • [9] Convolutional Neural Networks for Inference of Space Object Attitude Status
    Badura, Gregory P.
    Valenta, Christopher R.
    Gunter, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 69 (02) : 593 - 626
  • [10] Balachandran K., 2021, P 8 EUR C SPAC DEBR