Effectiveness and Safety of EUS Rendezvous After Failed Biliary Cannulation With ERCP A Systematic Review and Proportion Meta-analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Klair, Jagpal S. [1 ]
Zafar, Yousaf [2 ]
Ashat, Munish [3 ]
Bomman, Shivanand [1 ]
Murali, Arvind R. [3 ]
Jayaraj, Mahendran [4 ]
Law, Joanna [1 ]
Larsen, Michael [1 ]
Singh, Dhruv P. [5 ]
Rustagi, Tarun [6 ]
Irani, Shayan [1 ]
Ross, Andrew [1 ]
Kozarek, Richard [1 ]
Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Digest Dis Inst, Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Internal Med, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Clin, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Las Vegas, NV USA
[5] Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albuquerque, NM USA
[7] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词
failed ERCP; EUS rendezvous; biliary cannulation; safety; efficacy; DRAINAGE; QUALITY; ACCESS; MULTICENTER; OBSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001543
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an alternative to interventional radiology-guided rendezvous ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. However, there is significant variation in reported rates of success and adverse events associated with EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. We performed a systematic review and a proportion meta-analysis to reliably assess the effectiveness and safety of the EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Materials and Methods:We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings (from inception through August 2020) to identify studies reporting EUS-RV-assisted ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP techniques. Using the random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird, we calculated the pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Results:Twelve studies reporting a total of 342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of technical success (12 studies reporting a total of 342 patients) was 86.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 78.4-91.3]. The pooled rate of clinical success (4 studies reporting a total of 94 patients) was 80.8% (95% CI: 64.1-90.8). The pooled rate of overall adverse events (12 studies; 42 events in 342 patients) was 14% (95% CI: 10.5-18.4). Low to moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analyses. Conclusions:EUS-RV-assisted ERCP appears to be effective and safe in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. Given the risk of adverse events, it should be performed in centers with expertise in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance and Safety of EUS Ablation Techniques for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Papaefthymiou, Apostolis
    Johnson, Gavin J.
    Maida, Marcello
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Ramai, Daryl
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Arvanitakis, Marianna
    Ney, Alexander
    Fusai, Giuseppe K.
    Saftoiu, Adrian
    Tabacelia, Daniela
    Phillpotts, Simon
    Chapman, Michael H.
    Webster, George J.
    Pereira, Stephen P.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [42] Effectiveness and safety of Xuebijing injection for patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Sun, Wu
    Zhao, Yuwei
    Liao, Liang
    Zhao, Zhonghui
    Chen, Shiqi
    Yan, Xiaoling
    Wang, Xueyao
    Chao, Guojun
    Zhou, Jian
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2023, 43 (04) : 631 - 639
  • [43] The Effectiveness and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Treating Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al Zayer, Mohammed O.
    Al Johani, Fatima M.
    Al Ghamdi, Shahad A.
    Al Hejaili, Mohammed D.
    Al Mukhtar, Fatima H.
    Al Ariany, Arwa M.
    Al Anazi, Bashar H.
    Al Mutairi, Khalid A.
    Khoja, Rammaz H.
    Al Amer, Haidar F.
    Zeidan, Adel A.
    Al Faraj, Dunya
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (23)
  • [44] Effectiveness and safety of carboxytocin versus oxytocin in preventing postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Haiyan
    Xu, Lei
    Li, Yu
    Zhao, Shurong
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (04) : 889 - 901
  • [45] Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedjoudje, A.
    Sportes, A.
    Grabar, S.
    Zhang, A.
    Koch, S.
    Vuitton, L.
    Prat, F.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [46] In vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics on prophylaxis and treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Lijun
    Zhou, Mimi
    Young, Andrew
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Yan, Zhimin
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [47] Effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies
    Leonart, Leticia P.
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Ferreira, Vinicius L.
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    ENDOCRINE, 2019, 63 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [48] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treatment of tinnitus A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yepeng
    Fu, Qinwei
    Fu, Li
    Wang, Xuemei
    Zhong, Juan
    Zhang, Qinxiu
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (40) : E22501
  • [49] Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Updated systematic review with meta-analysis
    Didari, Tina
    Mozaffari, Shilan
    Nikfar, Shekoufeh
    Abdollahi, Mohammad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (10) : 3072 - 3084
  • [50] Effectiveness and safety of colistin among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Margalit, Ili
    Prendki, Virginie
    Tishler, Ori
    Falcone, Marco
    Tiseo, Giusy
    Leibovici-Weissman, Yaara
    Paul, Mical
    Yahav, Dafna
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 77 (08) : 2094 - 2104