Impact of muscle mass loss on outcomes in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving a second-line treatment

被引:0
作者
Zurlo, V. [1 ]
Rosa, F. [2 ,3 ]
Rinninella, E. [3 ,4 ]
Pontolillo, L. [5 ]
Beccia, V. [5 ]
Maratta, M. [5 ]
Tortora, G. [3 ,5 ]
Alfieri, S. [3 ,6 ]
Pozzo, C. [5 ]
Strippoli, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Div Oncol, Lecce, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Emergency & Trauma Surg, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Med Sci & Surg, UOC Nutr Clin, Rome, Italy
[5] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Rome, Italy
[6] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Digest Surg, Rome, Italy
关键词
Gastric Cancer; BMI; Sarcopenia; SMI; Malnutrition; Personalized therapy; LEAN BODY-MASS; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; INDEPENDENT DETERMINANT; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; OVARIAN-CANCER; SOLID TUMORS; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; SARCOPENIA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia is a frequent disorder among cancer patients. It commonly leads to muscle mass wasting and poor clinical outcomes, even though it is rarely recognized and often undertreated. The relationship between skeletal muscle depletion and chemotherapy toxicity or postoperative complications is well known. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes of pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 88 pretreated GC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their skeletal mass index (SMI): sarcopenic patients with low SMI (<= 39 cm(2)/m(2) for women and <= 55 cm(2)/ m(2 )for men) and non-sarcopenic patients with normal/high SMI value. The two groups were compared according to outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in patients with normal/high SMI than in those with low SMI (6 vs. 3.5 months, respectively; HR 0.52). Similarly, the overall response rate (ORR) was higher in the subgroup with normal/high SMI (41% vs. 20%; p=0.02). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different, but multivariate analysis demonstrated that both SMI and performance status were associated with OS. In the sarcopenic group, the patients treated in the second line with paclitaxel and ramucirumab regimen showed a better outcome profile. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the group of patients with low SMI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early recognition of sarcopenia may contribute to personalizing second or further lines of treatment in advanced GC and to weigh up the potential risk of serious toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:1575 / 1584
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Clinical Impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Nutritional Status in Patients with Recurrent or Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Nivolumab [J].
Hu, Qingjiang ;
Kudo, Kensuke ;
Yukaya, Takafumi ;
Hasuda, Hirofumi ;
Nakanishi, Ryota ;
Nakanoko, Tomonori ;
Ando, Koji ;
Ota, Mitsuhiko ;
Kimura, Yasue ;
Koga, Tadashi ;
Kusumoto, Tetsuya ;
Oki, Eiji ;
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu .
ONCOLOGY, 2025, 103 (03) :192-200
[42]   A Bayesian network meta-analysis on second-line systemic therapy in advanced gastric cancer [J].
Zhu, Xiaofu ;
Ko, Yoo-Joung ;
Berry, Scott ;
Shah, Keya ;
Lee, Esther ;
Chan, Kelvin .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2017, 20 (04) :646-654
[43]   Optimal indications for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer [J].
Hasegawa, Hiroko ;
Fujitani, Kazumasa ;
Nakazuru, Shoichi ;
Hirao, Motohiro ;
Mita, Eiji ;
Tsujinaka, Toshimasa .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2012, 23 (04) :465-470
[44]   Loss of muscle mass in the end of life in patients with advanced cancer [J].
Wallengren, Ola ;
Iresjo, Britt-Marie ;
Lundholm, Kent ;
Bosaeus, Ingvar .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (01) :79-86
[45]   Second-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Taxanes versus 5-FU-Based Treatment [J].
Duzkopru, Yakup ;
Cilbir, Ebru ;
Imamoglu, Goksen Inanc ;
Dogan, Ozlem ;
Eren, Tulay .
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2023, 33 (07) :770-774
[46]   Advanced gastric cancer: Is there enough evidence to call second-line therapy standard? [J].
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias ;
Saggese, Matilde ;
Lemech, Charlotte .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (44) :6376-6378
[47]   Phase I/II Study of Weekly Oraxol for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer [J].
Lee, Keun-Wook ;
Lee, Kyung Hee ;
Zang, Dae Young ;
Park, Young Iee ;
Shin, Dong Bok ;
Kim, Jin Won ;
Im, Seock-Ah ;
Koh, Sung Ae ;
Yu, Kyung-Sang ;
Cho, Joo-Youn ;
Jung, Jin-A ;
Bang, Yung-Jue .
ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (08) :896-897
[48]   EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF APATINIB COMBINED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED SECOND-LINE GASTRIC CANCER [J].
Fan, Cuizhen ;
Guo, Hongqiang ;
Chu, Yuping ;
An, Guangyu .
ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2022, 38 (01) :1-5
[49]   Advanced gastric cancer:Is there enough evidence to call second-line therapy standard? [J].
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ;
Matilde Saggese ;
Charlotte Lemech .
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, (44) :6376-6378
[50]   Prognostic factors in 868 advanced gastric cancer patients treated with second-line chemotherapy in the real world [J].
Fanotto, Valentina ;
Cordio, Stefano ;
Pasquini, Giulia ;
Fontanella, Caterina ;
Rimassa, Lorenza ;
Leone, Francesco ;
Rosati, Gerardo ;
Santini, Daniele ;
Giampieri, Riccardo ;
Di Donato, Samantha ;
Tomasello, Gianluca ;
Silvestris, Nicola ;
Pietrantonio, Filippo ;
Battaglin, Francesca ;
Avallone, Antonio ;
Scartozzi, Mario ;
Lutrino, Eufemia Stefania ;
Melisi, Davide ;
Antonuzzo, Lorenzo ;
Pellegrino, Antonio ;
Torri, Valter ;
Aprile, Giuseppe .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2017, 20 (05) :825-833