Examining the relationship between women's descriptive political representation and women's possibility to participate in civil society across regime types

被引:0
作者
Ehrhart, Anna [1 ]
Lundasen, Susanne Wallman [2 ]
Liden, Gustav [1 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Sundsvall, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Local Govt Studies, Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
Women; descriptive representation; legislators; civil society; regime types; SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION; NATIONAL LEGISLATURES; GENDER QUOTAS; DEMOCRACY; DEMOCRATIZATION; TRANSITIONS; ENGAGEMENT; PARLIAMENT; KNOWLEDGE; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1080/17448689.2024.2327396
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study examines the link between women's representation in national parliaments and their possibility to participate in civil society. Utilizing panel data from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset, covering 1975-2019, we investigate how the presence of women in parliaments influences the possibility for women to participate in civil society, especially in non-liberal democratic settings. The results indicate a positive association post-1990, coinciding with an international emphasis on civil society and a rise in women's parliamentary representation in both liberal democracies and autocratic regimes. The study however highlights that in hybrid and autocratic regimes, increased female representation can also be used to project a gender-equal image without genuine democratization intentions. These findings suggest a correlation between the increase in women in parliaments and greater opportunities for their participation in civil society, but do not imply that the results reflect processes towards democracy. The findings contribute to understanding women's possibilities in non-democratic regimes and underscores the need for further qualitative analysis to fully grasp the implications of these trends.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 169
页数:20
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [21] Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors
    Childs, Sarah
    Krook, Mona Lena
    [J]. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2009, 44 (02) : 125 - 145
  • [22] In Whose Interest? Gender and Mass-Elite Priority Congruence in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Clayton, Amanda
    Josefsson, Cecilia
    Mattes, Robert
    Mozaffar, Shaheen
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 52 (01) : 69 - 101
  • [23] Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates
    Clayton, Amanda
    Josefsson, Cecilia
    Wang, Vibeke
    [J]. POLITICS & GENDER, 2017, 13 (02) : 276 - 304
  • [24] Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation
    Coffe, Hilde
    Bolzendahl, Catherine
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2010, 62 (5-6) : 318 - 333
  • [25] Democracy with adjectives - Conceptual innovation in comparative research
    Collier, D
    Levitsky, S
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 1997, 49 (03) : 430 - &
  • [26] Collischon M, 2020, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ, V72, P289, DOI 10.1007/s11577-020-00699-8
  • [27] Coppedge M, 2020, VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY: MEASURING TWO CENTURIES OF POLITICAL CHANGE, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108347860
  • [28] Coppedge M., 2021, V DEM CODEBOOK V111
  • [29] The Methodology of "Varieties of Democracy" (V-Dem)
    Coppedge, Michael
    Gerring, John
    Knutsen, Carl Henrik
    Krusell, Joshua
    Medzihorsky, Juraj
    Pernes, Josefine
    Skaaning, Svend-Erik
    Stepanova, Natalia
    Teorell, Jan
    Tzelgov, Eitan
    Wilson, Steven L.
    Lindberg, Staffan, I
    [J]. BMS-BULLETIN OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY-BULLETIN DE METHODOLOGIE SOCIOLOGIQUE, 2019, 143 (01): : 107 - 133
  • [30] Dahl R. A., 1973, POLYARCHY PARTICIPAT