Should intermittent pneumatic compression devices be standard therapy for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in major surgery? Protocol for a randomised clinical trial (IMPOSTERS)

被引:1
作者
Lott, Natalie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Douglas, Jeanene Lizbeth [3 ,4 ]
Magnusson, Monique [3 ,4 ]
Gani, Jonathan [2 ,3 ]
Reeves, Penny [2 ,5 ]
Connah, David [6 ]
Organ, Nicole [7 ]
Oldmeadow, Chris [2 ,8 ]
Attia, John [2 ]
Smith, Stephen Ridley [2 ,3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] John Hunter Hosp, Surg, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Surg & Perioperat Care Res Grp, Hunter Med Res Inst, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
[4] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[5] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[6] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[7] John Hunter Hosp, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[8] Hunter Med Res Inst, Data Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[9] Calvary Mater Newcastle, Surg, Waratah, NSW, Australia
关键词
SURGERY; Thromboembolism; HEALTH ECONOMICS; Clinical Trial; COMPLICATIONS; METHODOLOGY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078913
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognised postsurgical risk. Current prevention methods involve low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), graduated compression stockings (GCS), and intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCDs). Australian guidelines, commonly adopted by surgeons, recommend LMWH with GCS and/or IPCDs. IPCDs pose clinical risks, increase care burden, are poorly tolerated, and are costly single-use plastic items. Utilising only LMWH and GCS, without IPCDs, could be more practical, patient-friendly, and cost-effective, with added environmental benefits.Methods This is a multicentre, prospective, two-arm randomised controlled non-inferiority trial at five New South Wales (NSW) hospitals, in Australia. We propose to randomise 4130 participants in a 1:1 ratio between arm A: LMWH+GCS+IPCDs (n=2065) or arm B: LMWH+GCS (n=2065). The primary outcome of interest is symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism) identified at the day 30 phone follow-up (FU), confirmed by ultrasound or imaging. Radiologists interpreting the lower-extremity ultrasonography will be blinded to intervention allocation. Secondary outcomes are quality of life at baseline, days 30 and 90 FU using the 5-level European Quality of Life Score, compliance and adverse events with IPCDs, GCS, and LMWH, as well as healthcare costs (from the perspective of the patient and the hospital), and all-cause mortality. The trial has 90% power to detect a 2% non-inferiority margin to detect a reduction rate of VTE from 4% to 2%.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH02276) protocol V.10, 13 July 2023. Study findings will be presented at local and national conferences and in scientific research journals.Trial registration number ANZCTR12622001527752
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[41]   Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Noncolorectal Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Major Abdominal Surgery [J].
Visioni, Anthony ;
Shah, Rupen ;
Gabriel, Emmanuel ;
Attwood, Kristopher ;
Kukar, Moshim ;
Nurkin, Steven .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 267 (01) :57-65
[42]  
VTE prophylaxis, 2023, BMJ best practice
[43]  
Waheed S., 2023, Deep Vein Thrombosis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Pujitha Kudaravalli declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. Disclosure: David Hotwagner declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.: StatPearls Publishing Copyright
[44]  
Wille-Jorgensen P, 1996, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V2010, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001217, 10.1002/14651858.CD001217]