Outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury after stress ulcer prophylaxis: a retrospective multicenter study

被引:2
作者
Mcgraw, Constance [1 ]
Briscoe, Abigale [2 ]
Reynolds, Cassandra [3 ]
Carrick, Matthew [4 ]
Palacio, Carlos H. [5 ]
Waswick, William [6 ]
Miller, April [4 ]
Trujillo, Laura [7 ]
Bar-Or, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Med Ctr, Trauma Res, Englewood, CO 80113 USA
[2] St Anthony Hosp & Med Campus, Trauma Serv, Lakewood, CO USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Trauma Serv, Englewood, CO USA
[4] Med City Plano, Trauma Serv, Plano, TX USA
[5] McAllen Med Ctr, Trauma Serv, South Texas Hlth Syst, Mcallen, TX USA
[6] Wesley Med Ctr, Trauma Serv, Wichita, KS USA
[7] Penrose Community Hosp, Trauma Serv, Colorado Springs, CO USA
关键词
Brain Injuries; Traumatic; Glasgow Coma Scale; critical care; pneumonia; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HEAD-INJURY; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/tsaco-2023-001285
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Stress ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) present significant morbidity and mortality risks. Despite the low reported stress ulcer rates, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is widely administered in neurocritical care. It was hypothesized that universal SUP administration may not be associated with reduced rates of complications across all neurocritical care patients. Methods This retrospective study encompassed neurocritical care patients aged >= 18 with moderate or severe TBI or SCI, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between October 2020 and September 2021, across six level I trauma centers. Exclusions included patients with an ICU stay <2 days, prior SUP medication use, and pre-existing SUP diagnoses. The primary exposure was SUP, with the primary outcome being clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeds (CSGIBs). Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified by admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) groups. Results Among 407 patients, 83% received SUP, primarily H2 receptor antagonists (88%) and proton pump inhibitors (12%). Patients on SUP were significantly younger, had lower admission GCS scores, higher Injury Severity Scores, longer ICU stays, and higher rates of mechanical ventilation than non-SUP patients. Overall, CSGIBs were rare (1%) and not significantly different between the SUP and non-SUP groups (p=0.06). However, CSGIBs exclusively occurred in patients with GCS scores of 3-8, and SUP was associated with a significantly lower rate of CSGIBs in this subgroup (p=0.03). SUP was also linked to significantly higher pneumonia rates in both GCS 3-8 and GCS 9-12 patients. Conclusions This study highlights the low incidence of CSGIBs in neurocritical trauma patients and suggests potential benefits of SUP, particularly for those with severe neurological impairment. Nevertheless, the increased risk of pneumonia associated with SUP in these patients warrants caution. Further research is crucial to refine SUP guidelines for neurocritical care patients and inform optimal strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Alain BBN, 2008, CHIN J TRAUMATOL, V11, P114
[2]   Withholding Pantoprazole for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis [J].
Alhazzani, Waleed ;
Guyatt, Gordon ;
Alshahrani, Mohammed ;
Deane, Adam M. ;
Marshall, John C. ;
Hall, Richard ;
Muscedere, John ;
English, Shane W. ;
Lauzier, Francois ;
Thabane, Lehana ;
Arabi, Yaseen M. ;
Karachi, Tim ;
Rochwerg, Bram ;
Finfer, Simon ;
Daneman, Nick ;
Alshamsi, Fayez ;
Zytaruk, Nicole ;
Heel-Ansdell, Diane ;
Cook, Deborah .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (07) :1121-1129
[3]  
American College of Surgeons, 2022, National trauma data standard Internet.
[4]   Comparison of the Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection Risk of Using Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Stress Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Azab, Mohamed ;
Doo, Loomee ;
Doo, Daniel H. ;
Elmofti, Yousif ;
Ahmed, Muazer ;
Cadavona, John Jay ;
Liu, Xibei B. ;
Shafi, Amaan ;
Joo, Moon Kyung ;
Yoo, Ji Won .
GUT AND LIVER, 2017, 11 (06) :781-788
[5]   Stress ulcer prophylaxis in trauma patients [J].
Barletta, JF ;
Erstad, BL ;
Fortune, JB .
CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 6 (06) :526-530
[6]   EFFECT OF RANITIDINE ON INTRAGASTRIC PH AND STRESS-RELATED UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEAD-INJURY [J].
BURGESS, P ;
LARSON, GM ;
DAVIDSON, P ;
BROWN, J ;
METZ, CA .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1995, 40 (03) :645-650
[7]   The attribute mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients [J].
Cook D.J. ;
Griffith L.E. ;
Walter S.D. ;
Guyatt G.H. ;
Meade M.O. ;
Heyland D.K. ;
Kirby A. ;
Tryba M. .
Critical Care, 5 (6) :368-375
[8]  
Cook DJ, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P308, DOI 10.1001/jama.275.4.308
[9]  
FABIAN TC, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P185
[10]   Stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients not in intensive care units [J].
Grube, Rebekah R. Arthur ;
May, D. Byron .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2007, 64 (13) :1396-1400