A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data

被引:2
作者
Mcdaniel, C. C. [1 ]
Lo-Ciganic, W. -h. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, J. [2 ]
Chou, C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, 4306 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Prescribing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, North Florida South Georgia Vet Hlth Syst, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Machine learning; Prescribing behaviors; Social determinants of health; Therapeutic inertia; Treatment intensification; A1C GOAL ATTAINMENT; CLINICAL INERTIA; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; POPULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To estimate the therapeutic inertia prevalence for patients with type 2 diabetes, develop and validate a machine learning model predicting therapeutic inertia, and determine the added predictive value of area-level social determinants of health (SDOH).Methods This prognostic study with a retrospective cohort design used OneFlorida data (linked electronic health records (EHRs) from 1240 practices/clinics in Florida). The study cohort included adults (aged >= 18) with type 2 diabetes, HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol), >= one ambulatory visit, and >= one antihyperglycemic medication prescribed (excluded patients prescribed insulin before HbA1C). The outcome was therapeutic inertia, defined as absence of treatment intensification within six months after HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol). The predictors were patient, provider, and healthcare system factors. Machine learning methods included gradient boosting machines (GBM), random forests (RF), elastic net (EN), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The DeLong test compared the discriminative ability (represented by C-statistics) between models.Results The cohort included 31,087 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 58.89 (SD = 13.27) years, 50.50% male, 58.89% White). The therapeutic inertia prevalence was 39.80% among the 68,445 records. GBM outperformed (C-statistic from testing sample = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84) RF (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.79-0.80), EN (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), and LASSO (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), p < 0.05. Area-level SDOH significantly increased the discriminative ability versus models without SDOH (C-statistic for GBM = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.84-0.85 vs. 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84), p < 0.05.Conclusions Using EHRs of patients with type 2 diabetes from a large state, machine learning predicted therapeutic inertia (prevalence = 40%). The model's ability to predict patients at high risk of therapeutic inertia is clinically applicable to diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1433
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 [J].
ElSayed, Nuha A. ;
Aleppo, Grazia ;
Aroda, Vanita R. ;
Bannuru, Raveendhara R. ;
Brown, Florence M. ;
Bruemmer, Dennis ;
Collins, Billy S. ;
Hilliard, Marisa E. ;
Isaacs, Diana ;
Johnson, Eric L. ;
Kahan, Scott ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Leon, Jose ;
Lyons, Sarah K. ;
Perry, Mary Lou ;
Prahalad, Priya ;
Pratley, Richard E. ;
Seley, Jane Jeffrie ;
Stanton, Robert C. ;
Gabbay, Robert A. .
DIABETES CARE, 2023, 46 :S140-S157
[12]   Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control [J].
Fu, A. Z. ;
Sheehan, J. J. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (09) :892-898
[13]  
Gabbay Robert A, 2020, Clin Diabetes, V38, P371, DOI 10.2337/cd20-0053
[14]   Determinants of good metabolic control without weight gain in type 2 diabetes management: a machine learning analysis [J].
Giorda, Carlo Bruno ;
Pisani, Federico ;
De Micheli, Alberto ;
Ponzani, Paola ;
Russo, Giuseppina ;
Guaita, Giacomo ;
Zilich, Rita ;
Musacchio, Nicoletta .
BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2020, 8 (01)
[15]   Informative missingness in electronic health record systems: the curse of knowing [J].
Rolf H. H. Groenwold .
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 4 (1)
[16]  
Health Resources and Services Administration, Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) data files
[17]   A Model Measuring Therapeutic Inertia and the Associated Factors Among Diabetes Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan [J].
Huang, Li-Ying ;
Shau, Wen-Yi ;
Yeh, Hseng-Long ;
Chen, Tsung-Tai ;
Hsieh, Jun Yi ;
Su, Syi ;
Lai, Mei-Shu .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 55 (01) :17-24
[18]   Incorporating machine learning and social determinants of health indicators into prospective risk adjustment for health plan payments [J].
Irvin, Jeremy A. ;
Kondrich, Andrew A. ;
Ko, Michael ;
Rajpurkar, Pranav ;
Haghgoo, Behzad ;
Landon, Bruce E. ;
Phillips, Robert ;
Petterson, Stephen ;
Ng, Andrew Y. ;
Basu, Sanjay .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[19]   Predictors of Clinical Inertia and Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Primary Care Physicians and Their Patients [J].
Isajev, Nemanja ;
Bjegovic-Mikanovic, Vesna ;
Bukumiric, Zoran ;
Vrhovac, David ;
Lalic, Nebojsa M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
[20]   Factors associated with clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with metformin monotherapy [J].
Kartoun, Uri ;
Iglay, Kristy ;
Shankar, R. Ravi ;
Beam, Andrew ;
Radican, Larry ;
Chatterjee, Arnaub ;
Rai, Jennifer K. ;
Shaw, Stanley .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (12) :2063-2070