A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data

被引:2
作者
Mcdaniel, C. C. [1 ]
Lo-Ciganic, W. -h. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, J. [2 ]
Chou, C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, 4306 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Prescribing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, North Florida South Georgia Vet Hlth Syst, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Machine learning; Prescribing behaviors; Social determinants of health; Therapeutic inertia; Treatment intensification; A1C GOAL ATTAINMENT; CLINICAL INERTIA; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; POPULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To estimate the therapeutic inertia prevalence for patients with type 2 diabetes, develop and validate a machine learning model predicting therapeutic inertia, and determine the added predictive value of area-level social determinants of health (SDOH).Methods This prognostic study with a retrospective cohort design used OneFlorida data (linked electronic health records (EHRs) from 1240 practices/clinics in Florida). The study cohort included adults (aged >= 18) with type 2 diabetes, HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol), >= one ambulatory visit, and >= one antihyperglycemic medication prescribed (excluded patients prescribed insulin before HbA1C). The outcome was therapeutic inertia, defined as absence of treatment intensification within six months after HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol). The predictors were patient, provider, and healthcare system factors. Machine learning methods included gradient boosting machines (GBM), random forests (RF), elastic net (EN), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The DeLong test compared the discriminative ability (represented by C-statistics) between models.Results The cohort included 31,087 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 58.89 (SD = 13.27) years, 50.50% male, 58.89% White). The therapeutic inertia prevalence was 39.80% among the 68,445 records. GBM outperformed (C-statistic from testing sample = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84) RF (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.79-0.80), EN (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), and LASSO (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), p < 0.05. Area-level SDOH significantly increased the discriminative ability versus models without SDOH (C-statistic for GBM = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.84-0.85 vs. 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84), p < 0.05.Conclusions Using EHRs of patients with type 2 diabetes from a large state, machine learning predicted therapeutic inertia (prevalence = 40%). The model's ability to predict patients at high risk of therapeutic inertia is clinically applicable to diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1433
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A Real-World Observational Study of Time to Treatment Intensification Among Elderly Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J].
Ajmera, Mayank ;
Raval, Amit ;
Zhou, Steve ;
Wei, Wenhui ;
Bhattacharya, Rituparna ;
Pan, Chunshen ;
Sambamoorthi, Usha .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (12) :1184-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, American community survey 5-Year data (2009-2018)
[3]   Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care [J].
Berlowitz, DR ;
Ash, AS ;
Glickman, M ;
Friedman, RH ;
Pogach, LM ;
Nelson, AL ;
Wong, AT .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) :1836-1853
[4]  
Bzowyckyj Andrew S, 2020, Diabetes Spectr, V33, P31, DOI 10.2337/ds19-0019
[5]   Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement [J].
Collins, G. S. ;
Reitsma, J. B. ;
Altman, D. G. ;
Moons, K. G. M. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (02) :146-154
[6]   Predictors of all-cause 30day readmission among Medicare patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Collins, Jenna ;
Abbass, Ibrahim M. ;
Harvey, Raymond ;
Suehs, Brandon ;
Uribe, Claudia ;
Bouchard, Jonathan ;
Prewitt, Todd ;
DeLuzio, Tony ;
Allen, Elsie .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 (08) :1517-1523
[7]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[8]   Machine Learning in Medicine [J].
Deo, Rahul C. .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (20) :1920-1930
[9]   Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers [J].
Doupe, Patrick ;
Faghmous, James ;
Basu, Sanjay .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (07) :808-815
[10]   Time to Treatment Intensification in Newly Treated Adult Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Comparison of Canada and the United States [J].
Dubois, Tyler B. ;
Simpson, Scot H. ;
Eurich, Dean T. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2020, 44 (04) :312-316