共 22 条
Technical assessment in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision: Is the complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool valid and reliable?
被引:0
作者:
Haug, Tora Rydtun
[1
,2
]
Orntoft, Mai-Britt Worm
[3
]
Miskovic, Danilo
[4
]
Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
[3
]
Johnsen, Soren Paaske
[5
]
Valentin, Jan Brink
[5
]
Ruiz, Marcos Gomez
[6
,7
]
Benz, Stefan
[8
]
Eeg Storli, Kristian
[9
]
Stearns, Adam T.
[10
]
Madsen, Anders Husted
[1
]
机构:
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] St Marks Hosp, Harrow, England
[5] Aalborg Univ, Danish Ctr Clin Hlth Serv Res, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Hosp Univ Marques Valdecilla, Colorectal Surg Unit, Santander, Spain
[7] Valdecilla Biomed Res Inst IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
[8] Kliniken Boblingen, Klin Allgemein & Viszeralchirurg, Boblingen, Germany
[9] Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus, Bergen, Norway
[10] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, England
关键词:
assessment tool;
colorectal surgery;
complete mesocolic excision;
reliability;
technical skills;
validity;
NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM;
SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES;
GENERALIZABILITY THEORY;
COLON;
SURGERY;
PERFORMANCE;
SURVIVAL;
D O I:
10.1111/codi.16756
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Aim: The complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT) is a novel tool designed to assess technical skills in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and reliability of CMECAT in a clinical context.Method: Colorectal surgeons were asked to submit video recorded laparoscopic CME resections for independent assessment of their technical abilities. The videos were grouped by surgeons' training level, and four established CME experts were recruited as CMECAT assessors. Extended reliability analysis (G-theory) was applied to describe assessor agreement.Results: A total of 19 videos and 72 assessments were included in the analysis. Overall, technical skills assessed by CMECAT improved with increased training level: the experts scored significantly better than the untrained surgeons (3.3 vs. 2.5 points; p < 0.01). On right-sided resections, significantly higher scores were reported with increased training level for all categories and sections, while for left-sided resections, the variance across groups was smaller and significantly higher scores were only reported for oncological safety describing items. Overall, assessor agreement was high (G-coefficient: 0.81).Conclusion: This study confirms that CMECAT can be applied to video recorded CME cases for technical skill assessment. Further, it can reliably assess technical performance in right sided CME surgery, where construct validity has now been established. More videos are required to evaluate its validity on left colonic CME. In the future, we hope CMECAT can improve feedback during CME training, serve as a tool in certification processes and contribute to distinguishing CME from conventional surgery in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:2139 / 2146
页数:8
相关论文