Paving the way for solutions improving access to kidney transplantation: a qualitative study from a multistakeholder perspective

被引:1
作者
van Merweland, Ruben [1 ]
Busschbach, Jan J. V. [1 ]
van de Wetering, Jacqueline [2 ]
Ismail, Sohal [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Sect Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, Dept Psychiat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Internal Med Nephrol & Transplantat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Health policy; Organisation of health services; Quality in health care; Renal transplantation; Dialysis; NEPHROLOGY; PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS; LIVING DONATION; HEMODIALYSIS; RECIPIENTS; KNOWLEDGE; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071483
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to obtain an in-depth perspective from stakeholders involved in access to kidney transplantation to pave the way for solutions in improving access to kidney transplantation. This study qualitatively explored factors influencing optimal access to kidney transplantation from a broad stakeholder perspective. Design A qualitative study was performed using semistructured interviews both in focus groups and with individual participants. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded according to the principles of grounded theory. Setting Participants were healthcare providers (geographically spread), patients and (former living) kidney donors, policy-makers and insurers. Participants Stakeholders (N=87) were interviewed regarding their perceptions, opinions and attitudes regarding access to kidney transplantation. Results The problems identified by stakeholders within the domains-policy, medical, psychological, social and economic-were acknowledged by all respondents. According to respondents, more efforts should be made to make healthcare providers and patients aware of the clinical guideline for kidney transplantation. The same opinion applied to differences in medical inclusion criteria used in the different transplantation centres. Stakeholders saw room for improvement based on psychological and social themes, especially regarding the provision of information. Many stakeholders described the need to rethink the current economic model to improve access to kidney transplantation. This discussion led to a definition of the most urgent problems for which, according to the respondents, a solution must be sought to optimise access to kidney transplantation. Conclusions Stakeholders indicated a high sense of urgency to solve barriers in patient access to kidney transplantation. Moreover, it appears that some barriers are quite straightforward to overcome; according to stakeholders, it is striking that this process has not yet been overcome. Stakeholders involved in kidney transplantation have provided directions for future solutions, and now it is possible to search for solutions with them.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, NJ US AM J TRANSPLAN
[2]   Pre-emptive kidney transplantation: the attractive alternative [J].
Asderakis, A ;
Augustine, T ;
Dyer, P ;
Short, C ;
Campbell, B ;
Parrott, NR ;
Johnson, RWG .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 13 (07) :1799-1803
[3]   The present and future of transplant organ shortage: some potential remedies [J].
Bastani, Bahar .
JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 33 (02) :277-288
[4]   Clinical Practice Guidelines on Wait-Listing for Kidney Transplantation: Consistent and Equitable? [J].
Batabyal, Pikli ;
Chapman, Jeremy R. ;
Wong, Germaine ;
Craig, Jonathan C. ;
Tong, Allison .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (07) :703-713
[5]   The Importance of Role Clarity for Development of Interprofessional Teams [J].
Bittner, Callie Anne .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2018, 49 (08) :345-347
[6]  
Brewerton Paul., 2001, Organizational Research Methods: A Guide for Students and Researchers
[7]  
Corbin J., 2015, Basics of Qualitative Research
[8]   Effect of HLA matching on the relative risk of mortality for kidney recipients - A comparison of the mortality risk after transplant to the mortality risk of remaining on the waiting list [J].
Edwards, EB ;
Bennett, LE ;
Cecka, JM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (09) :1274-1277
[9]  
ENTHOVEN AC, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V266, P2751
[10]  
Feder G, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P728