Mapping the Geography of Sustainability Transitions Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

被引:1
作者
Dhiman, Sunny [1 ]
Singh, Rajbeer [1 ]
Yadav, Raghvendra Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Ctr Studies Sci Policy, Sch Social Sci, New Delhi 110067, India
来源
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 82卷 / 03期
关键词
Multi-level perspective; Scopus; Socio-technical transitions; VOSviewer; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; INSIGHTS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.56042/jsir.v82i03.67245
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The transition towards sustainability is a global challenge, and in recent decades, Sustainability Transitions (ST) research has emerged as a promising approach to address climate change-led uncertainty. Despite the rapid rise in the sustainability transitions literature, it is primarily focused on developed or global north countries. The present paper attempts to use bibliometric tools to comprehend the intellectual landscape and distribution between global north-south and analyse the trends and hotspots in global south countries. The paper comprehensively examined ST literature on the Scopus citation database (from the inception of ST in 1994 to December 31, 2020). Based on statistical analysis performed on the dataset, there has been an exponential rise in research publications on ST since 2012. Globally, ST researchers mainly belong to OECD countries from Western Europe, especially in the UK, Netherlands and Germany. Conversely, the global south is lagging, except few developing nations such as China, South Africa, Brazil, and India. This skewed representation reflects the higher prevalence of ST initiatives in the global north, predominantly by a few European countries. About 40% of ST research is published in journals from the UK, Netherlands, the U.S., Switzerland and Canada. The citation analysis reflects that 60% of citations are from British and Dutch scholars, indicating a low academic influence of ST authors from developing countries. This study would stimulate more interest among Global South academics and policy researchers to put more effort into ST research and publication to bridge the existing gap.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 388
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Andrés A, 2009, MEASURING ACADEMIC RESEARCH: HOW TO UNDERTAKE A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY, P23
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR
[3]   bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis [J].
Aria, Massimo ;
Cuccurullo, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) :959-975
[4]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[5]   TOWARD A DEFINITION OF BIBLIOMETRICS [J].
BROADUS, RN .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1987, 12 (5-6) :373-379
[6]   Transition and transformation: A bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change [J].
Chappin, Emile J. L. ;
Ligtvoet, Andreas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 30 :715-723
[7]  
de Bellis, 2009, Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science of citation to cybermetrics
[8]  
Escobar Arturo., 1995, ENCOUNTERING DEV MAK
[9]  
European Commission, 2020, TRANSF INN SOC TRANS
[10]  
Geels F W, 2013, Reference list to transition publications