Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:28
作者
Liu, Kun [1 ]
Zhu, Youwen [1 ]
Zhu, Hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; targeted therapy; network meta-analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; PHASE-III; OPEN-LABEL; SORAFENIB; PLUS;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2022.1103055
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe existence of many phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) puzzle doctors and patients in choosing the most effective treatment strategies. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategy for unresectable HCC. MethodsThe included clinical trials were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases, in which immunotherapy or targeted therapy was regarded as the first-line treatment for unresectable HCC, published in English between January 1, 2010, and September 20, 2022. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the Chinese payer's perspective. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the ranks of different treatments using P-score, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated by NMA. Total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICER) were estimated from 15-year Markov models developed by CEA. ResultsWe identified 2,825 records, including 11,796 patients, from 15 RCTs. The NMA revealed that sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.75; P = 0.96) and camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.66; P = 0.94) could lead to great improvements in OS and PFS compared with sorafenib-related survival. The CEA indicated that tislelizumab increased by 0.220 QALYs (0.312 LYs) and decreased by $1,938 compared with sorafenib, which yielded ICERs of -$8,809/QALY (-$2,612/LY). Sensitivity analysis showed that the model was stable. ConclusionSintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar and camrelizumab plus rivoceranib significantly prolonged OS and PFS, respectively. Further considering the pharmacoeconomics factors, tislelizumab is the most cost-effective first-line treatment strategy for unresectable HCC in China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Assessment of Treatment With Sorafenib Plus Doxorubicin vs Sorafenib Alone in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 3 CALGB 80802 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K. ;
Shi, Qian ;
Knox, Jennifer J. ;
Kaubisch, Andreas ;
Niedzwiecki, Donna ;
Posey, James ;
Tan, Benjamin R., Jr. ;
Kavan, Petr ;
Goel, Rakesh ;
Lammers, Philip E. ;
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S. ;
Tam, Vincent C. ;
Rajdev, Lakshmi ;
Kelley, Robin K. ;
El Dika, Imane ;
Zemla, Tyler ;
Potaracke, Ryan, I ;
Balletti, Jennifer ;
El-Khoueiry, Anthony B. ;
Harding, James H. ;
Suga, Jennifer M. ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Goldberg, Richard M. ;
Bertagnolli, Monica M. ;
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey ;
O'Reilly, Eileen M. ;
Venook, Alan P. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (11) :1582-1588
[2]  
[Anonymous], Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian
[3]  
[Anonymous], US
[4]   Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Cai, Hongfu ;
Zhang, Longfeng ;
Li, Na ;
Zheng, Bin ;
Liu, Maobai .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (08) :553-562
[5]   Linifanib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial [J].
Cainap, Calin ;
Qin, Shukui ;
Huang, Wen-Tsung ;
Chung, Ik Joo ;
Pan, Hongming ;
Cheng, Ying ;
Kudo, Masatoshi ;
Kang, Yoon-Koo ;
Chen, Pei-Jer ;
Toh, Han-Chong ;
Gorbunova, Vera ;
Eskens, Ferry A. L. M. ;
Qian, Jiang ;
McKee, Mark D. ;
Ricker, Justin L. ;
Carlson, Dawn M. ;
El-Nowiem, Saied .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (02) :172-U77
[6]  
Cheng AL, 2022, J HEPATOL, V76, P862, DOI [10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.030, 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.07.003]
[7]   Sunitinib Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial [J].
Cheng, Ann-Lii ;
Kang, Yoon-Koo ;
Lin, Deng-Yn ;
Park, Joong-Won ;
Kudo, Masatoshi ;
Qin, Shukui ;
Chung, Hyun-Cheol ;
Song, Xiangqun ;
Xu, Jianming ;
Poggi, Guido ;
Omata, Masao ;
Lowenthal, Susan Pitman ;
Lanzalone, Silvana ;
Yang, Liqiang ;
Lechuga, Maria Jose ;
Raymond, Eric .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (32) :4067-+
[8]   First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis [J].
Chiang, Chi-Leung ;
Chan, Sik-Kwan ;
Lee, Shing-Fung ;
Choi, Horace Cheuk-Wai .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) :1-13
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Chiang, Chi-leung ;
Chan, Sik-kwan ;
Lee, Shing-fung ;
Wong, Irene Oi-ling ;
Choi, Horace Cheuk-wai .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (01)
[10]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)