Behavioral agricultural economics

被引:37
作者
Wuepper, David [1 ]
Bukchin-Peles, Shira [2 ,3 ]
Just, David [4 ]
Zilberman, David [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Agr Econ & Policy Grp, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Geog, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Global Int Dev Program, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] SC Johnson Coll Business Cornell, Sci & Business, Ithaca, NY USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr Econ, Berkeley, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, 302 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, CA 94705 USA
关键词
agricultural economics; applied economics; behavioral economics; history of economic thought; psychology and economics; FIELD-EXPERIMENT; TIME-PREFERENCES; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; NUDGING FARMERS; PROSPECT-THEORY; SELF-EFFICACY; RISK; ATTITUDES; IMPACT; INNOVATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/aepp.13343
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Agricultural and other fields of economics have always co-evolved and benefitted from each other's insights. Over time, a general convergence of all social sciences began, and various fields of psychology, sociology, anthropology, and political science started to overlap with general and agricultural economics. Within economics, it was especially the rise of behavioral economics, that has steered the field toward the other social sciences. It departs from the assumption of perfectly rational expected utility maximizers and allows for greater diversity in decision-makers' objectives and constraints. Agricultural economics has been early to recognize the need to make economic choice models more realistic. This can be explained by the particularities of agricultural economics and agriculture. Agricultural economists are tasked with solving specific, practical problems, and thus behavioral deviations from model predictions have always been salient and relevant to policy recommendations. Then, farmers-and to some extent also consumers-make choices in particularly complex and uncertain environments and must use all strategic tools at their disposal to deal with their "bounded rationality". These include the reliance on culture and other heuristics. Agricultural economics continues to synergize economic theory and practice with insights from other disciplines and real-world experiences and is an important driver towards further unification of all social sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:2094 / 2105
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
[31]   The Agricultural Origins of Time Preference [J].
Galor, Oded ;
Ozak, Omer .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (10) :3064-3103
[32]   HYBRID CORN - AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMICS OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
ECONOMETRICA, 1957, 25 (04) :501-522
[33]   LEARNING THROUGH NOTICING: THEORY AND EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT [J].
Hanna, Rema ;
Mullainathan, Sendhil ;
Schwartzstein, Joshua .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 129 (03) :1311-1353
[34]   Marketing and Technology Adoption and Diffusion [J].
Heiman, Amir ;
Ferguson, Joel ;
Zilberman, David .
APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2020, 42 (01) :21-30
[35]   Measuring time preferences: Comparing methods and evaluating the magnitude effect [J].
Hermann, Daniel ;
Musshoff, Oliver .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 65 :16-26
[36]   INPUT ALLOCATION IN MULTICROP SYSTEMS [J].
JUST, RE ;
ZILBERMAN, D ;
HOCHMAN, E ;
BARSHIRA, Z .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (01) :200-209
[37]   ESTIMATION OF MULTICROP PRODUCTION-FUNCTIONS [J].
JUST, RE ;
ZILBERMAN, D ;
HOCHMAN, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 65 (04) :770-780
[38]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[39]  
Kahneman D, 2015, FORTUNE, V172, P20
[40]   Preferences, personality, aspirations, and farmer behavior [J].
Knapp, Ladina ;
Wuepper, David ;
Finger, Robert .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 52 (06) :901-913