A review of collaborative assessment strategies in online learning

被引:4
作者
Zhu, Meina [1 ,2 ]
Ergulec, Funda [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Learning Design & Technol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
online collaborative learning; online collaborative learning assessment; group collaborative learning; mapping review; online learning; GROUP-SIZE; GROUP WORK; PEER ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PROJECTS; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1080/01587919.2022.2150127
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Online collaborative learning is increasingly used in online courses in higher education, but assessing student online collaborative learning presents unique challenges as well as interesting opportunities. Thus, it is critical to gain a clear picture of online group collaboration assessment strategies, including group learning assessment methods and examining the effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities in online education. The present study systematically reviewed 12 empirical studies on online collaborative learning assessment in higher education published in journals from 2011 to 2021. The results show that diverse strategies were used to facilitate group collaboration, including group agreements, project planning, role assignments, problem-based projects, and instructor feedback. The reviewed studies primarily evaluated learners through instructor evaluation, peer evaluation, and self-evaluation methods. The most common strategy was instructor assessment, while self-evaluations were used the least. The findings of this mapping review provide practical examples for future online group collaborative learning assessment research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 543
页数:22
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]  
Herrington J., 2003, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, V19, P59
[32]   Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: an analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques [J].
Hew, Khe Foon ;
Cheung, Wing Sum .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (03) :303-319
[33]   The relationship between class size and online activity patterns in asynchronous computer conferencing environments [J].
Hewitt, Jim ;
Brett, Clare .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2007, 49 (04) :1258-1271
[34]  
Hu HH, 2015, E-Learning and Digital Media, V12, P17, DOI [10.1177/2042753014558373, 10.1177/2042753014558373, DOI 10.1177/2042753014558373]
[35]  
Jahng N., 2012, European Journal of Open, Distance and ELearning
[36]  
Johnson D.W., 2014, Journal On Excellence College Teaching, V25, P85, DOI DOI 10.1057/9780230283008_6
[37]  
Kaye A., 1992, Collaborative Learning through computer conferencing
[38]   Influence of group size on students' participation in online discussion forums [J].
Kim, Jungjoo .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :123-129
[39]   The development and implementation of a web-based formative peer assessment system for enhancing students' metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks [J].
Kim, Minjeong ;
Ryu, Jeeheon .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 61 (04) :549-561
[40]   Online Group Work Design: Processes, Complexities, and Intricacies [J].
Kleinsasser, Robert ;
Hong, Yi-Chun .
TECHTRENDS, 2016, 60 (06) :569-576