Design-based research in mathematics education: trends, challenges and potential

被引:7
作者
Fowler, Samuel [1 ]
Cutting, Chelsea [1 ]
Fiedler, Sebastian H. D. [2 ]
Leonard, Simon N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Ctr Change & Complex Learning C3L, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Nuertingen Geislingen Univ, Nurtingen, Germany
关键词
Design-based research; Research capacity; Digital humanities and social sciences; Meta-study; Theory development; Mathematics education research;
D O I
10.1007/s13394-021-00407-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Originating from the learning sciences community, design-based research (DBR) is attracting interest from many educational researchers including those focused on mathematics. Beyond its research role, it is being seen as a collaborative way to engage teachers in deep professional development leading not only to changes in skill but also in purpose. Previous reviews of the approach, however, have offered only cautious optimism for the capacity of DBR to support widespread or scalable change. This paper will use methods drawn from the digital humanities and social sciences to explore patterns relating to regional differences, theoretical underpinnings, practical implementation and methodological choice in recent DBR research in the domain of mathematics education. The findings suggest that much of the work presented as DBR might be better characterized as 'implementation studies' as they contain only limited commitment to theoretical development capable of supporting the scaling of innovation. The exceptions appear to occur in settings with well-developed research capacity which recognizes the need for ontological innovation of theory whilst iteratively and comprehensively exploring the complexities of authentic learning interventions. An example of a rich mathematical research study using DBR is provided to point to the potential for this methodology to achieve its overarching aims more fully.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 658
页数:24
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?
    Anderson, Terry
    Shattuck, Julie
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 41 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [2] Bakker A, 2015, ADVNCS MTHMTCS EDUC, P429, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
  • [3] Bannen M, 2018, JUST TOOL J DEWEYS P
  • [4] Biesta G., 2010, Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy, DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319
  • [5] Why educational research should not just solve problems, but should cause them as well
    Biesta, Gert
    Filippakou, Ourania
    Wainwright, Emma
    Aldridge, David
    [J]. BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 45 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [6] Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education
    Biesta, Gert
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2017, 49 (04) : 315 - 330
  • [7] Collins A., 1992, DESIGN SCI ED
  • [8] Confrey J, 2019, RES MATH EDUC, P123, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-23505-5_9
  • [9] A design research study of a curriculum and diagnostic assessment system for a learning trajectory on equipartitioning
    Confrey, Jere
    Maloney, Alan
    [J]. ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2015, 47 (06): : 919 - 932
  • [10] Absorptive Capacity as a Means of Understanding and Addressing the Disconnects Between Research and Practice
    Crain-Dorough, Mindy
    Elder, Adam C.
    [J]. QUALITY OF RESEARCH EVIDENCE IN EDUCATION: HOW DO WE KNOW?, 2021, 45 (01): : 67 - 100