Assessing the Quantitative Risk of Urban Hydrogen Refueling Station in Seoul, South Korea, Using SAFETI Model

被引:8
作者
Kwak, Hyunjun [1 ]
Kim, Minji [1 ]
Min, Mimi [1 ]
Park, Byoungjik [2 ]
Jung, Seungho [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Environm & Safety Engn, Suwon 16499, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Civil Engn & Bldg Technol, Dept Fire Safety Res, Hwaseong 18544, South Korea
关键词
hydrogen refueling station; quantitative risk analysis; SAFETI; jet fire; fireball; vapor cloud explosion; consequence analysis; individual risk; societal risk; ALARP; QRA;
D O I
10.3390/en17040867
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Hydrogen refueling stations (HRS) operating at high pressures pose a higher risk of leakage than conventional gas stations. Therefore, in this study, a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) was conducted using DNV-GL SAFETI v.8.9. The impact of the shutoff valve was quantitatively assessed, and step-by-step mitigation was applied to propose the minimum installation requirements for the valve necessary to achieve broadly acceptable risk levels. The QRA includes sequence analysis (CA), individual risk (IR), and societal risk (SR), with accident scenarios consisting of catastrophic ruptures and three leak scenarios. The research results indicate that the application of a dual shutoff valve system resulted in an IR of 7.48 x 10-5, effectively controlling the risk below the as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) criteria of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). The SR was analyzed based on the ALARP criteria in the Netherlands, and the application of the dual shutoff valve system effectively controlled the risk below the ALARP criteria. Consequently, this study suggests that applying a dual shutoff valve system with a mitigation value exceeding 1.21 x 10-2 can successfully mitigate the risk of urban hydrogen refueling stations to broadly acceptable levels.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   ALARP and CBA all in the same game [J].
Ale, B. J. M. ;
Hartford, D. N. D. ;
Slater, D. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 76 :90-100
[2]  
American Petroleum Institute, 2016, API Pub 581-2016 Risk-Based Inspection Technology
[3]   Hydrogen production through renewable and non-renewable energy processes and their impact on climate change [J].
Amin, Muhammad ;
Shah, Hamad Hussain ;
Fareed, Anaiz Gul ;
Khan, Wasim Ullah ;
Chung, Eunhyea ;
Zia, Adeel ;
Farooqi, Zia Ur Rahman ;
Lee, Chaehyeon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (77) :33112-33134
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SAND2009-0874
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Effects of Blast Pressure on Structures and the Human Body
[6]   A dynamic multi-agent approach for modeling the evolution of multi-hazard accident scenarios in chemical plants [J].
Chen, Chao ;
Reniers, Genserik ;
Khakzad, Nima .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 207
[7]   Green methods for hydrogen production [J].
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (02) :1954-1971
[8]  
DNV, 2023, SAFETI Manage Hazards for Safe and Efficient Operations, Safeti Flyer
[9]   Risk analysis by means of a QRA approach on a LPG cylinder filling installation [J].
Dormohammadi, Ali ;
Zarei, Esmaeil ;
Delkhosh, Mohammad Bagher ;
Gholami, Ali .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2014, 33 (01) :77-84
[10]  
Emerson Worthington D., 1982, Report DNV