EXAMINING EXEMPLAR ELEMENTS OF SELECTED MALAYSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS' ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY: DOCUMENT ANALYSIS BASED EVIDENCE

被引:0
作者
Singh, Manjet Kaur Mehar [1 ]
Jun, Jonathan Phan Kar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Languages Literacies & Translat, Kepala Batas 11800, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr English Language Commun, Singapore 119077, Singapore
来源
JOURNAL OF NUSANTARA STUDIES-JONUS | 2024年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Academic integrity policy; core elements of exemplar; document analysis; Malaysian higher education institutions; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH; PLAGIARISM; STRATEGIES; DISCOURSES; EXPLAIN;
D O I
10.24200/jonus.vol9iss1pp269-293
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: This study examined the comprehensiveness and sufficiency of academic integrity (AI) policies of selected Malaysian higher education institutions. The investigation of eight public and private universities' AI policies were guided by the five core elements of exemplar AI policy framework developed by Bretag, Mahmud, Wallace, Walker, James, Green, East, McGowan and Partridge (2011). Methodology: This qualitative method research focused on document analysis of purposively selected eight AI policies. The five core elements that guided the document analysis are access, approach, responsibility, detail and support. The data collected from document analysis was analysed via NVivo 11 software. Findings: Public universities are educative based and private universities practice punitive approach. All universities provide access of the AI documents to the university community and public, implement ad hoc basis education, awareness campaigns and modules to support the AI agenda and encourage responsibility among the staff and students to curb academic dishonesty. As for detail, universities differ in terms of amount and type of information provided in the documents. Contributions: The findings will provide universities evidence to make their existing AI policies more robust and comprehensive.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 293
页数:25
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] 'It's not fair': policy discourses and students' understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university
    Adam, Lee
    Anderson, Vivienne
    Spronken-Smith, Rachel
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (01) : 17 - 32
  • [2] The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What?
    Alfredo, Katherine
    Hart, Hillary
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2011, 17 (03) : 447 - 457
  • [3] Aluede O.O.-E., 2006, Reading Improvement, V43, P97
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity, DOI DOI 10.15713/INS.MMJ.3
  • [5] Students Reported for Cheating Explain What They Think Would Have Stopped Them
    Beasley, Eric M.
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 24 (03) : 229 - 252
  • [6] Addressing student plagiarism from the library learning commons
    Bell, Stephanie
    [J]. INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCE, 2018, 119 (3-4): : 203 - 214
  • [7] Bradley C, 2011, CHANDOS INF PROF SER, P1
  • [8] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [9] Braxton J.M., 2011, Professors behaving badly: Faculty misconduct in graduate education
  • [10] 'Teach us how to do it properly!' An Australian academic integrity student survey
    Bretag, Tracey
    Mahmud, Saadia
    Wallace, Margaret
    Walker, Ruth
    McGowan, Ursula
    East, Julianne
    Green, Margaret
    Partridge, Lee
    James, Colin
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (07) : 1150 - 1169