Artificial intelligence diagnostic model for multi-site fracture X-ray images of extremities based on deep convolutional neural networks

被引:2
作者
Xie, Yanling [1 ]
Li, Xiaoming
Chen, Fengxi [1 ]
Wen, Ru [1 ]
Jing, Yang [2 ]
Liu, Chen [1 ]
Wang, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Army Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
[2] Huiying Med Technol Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; artificial intelligence (AI); X-ray; multi-site fracture of extremities; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.21037/qims-23-878
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The rapid and accurate diagnosis of fractures is crucial for timely treatment of trauma patients. Deep learning, one of the most widely used forms of artificial intelligence (AI), is now commonly employed in medical imaging for fracture detection. This study aimed to construct a deep learning model using big data to recognize multiple-fracture X-ray images of extremity bones. Methods: Radiographic imaging data of extremities were retrospectively collected from five hospitals between January 2017 and September 2020. The total number of people finally included was 25,635 and the total number of images included was 26,098. After labeling the lesions, the randomized method used 90% of the data as the training set to develop the fracture detection model, and the remaining 10% was used as the validation set to verify the model. The faster region convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) algorithm was adopted to construct diagnostic models for detection. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the image segmentation accuracy. The performances of detection models were evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).Results: The free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve value was 0.886 and 0.843 for the detection of single and multiple fractures, respectively. Additionally, the effective identification AUC for all parts was higher than 0.920. Notably, the AUC for wrist fractures reached 0.952. The average accuracy in detecting bone fracture regions in the extremities was 0.865. When analyzing single and multiple lesions at the patient level, the sensitivity was 0.957 for patients with multiple lesions and 0.852 for those with single lesions. In the segmentation task, the training set (the data set used by the machine learning model to train and learn) and the validation set (the data set used to evaluate the performance of the model) reached 0.996 and 0.975, respectively.Conclusions: The faster R-CNN training algorithm exhibits excellent performance in simultaneously identifying fractures in the hands, feet, wrists, ankles, radius and ulna, and tibia and fibula on X-ray images. It demonstrates high accuracy, low false-negative rates, and controllable false-positive rates. It can serve as a valuable screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1930 / 1943
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Computer vs human: Deep learning versus perceptual training for the detection of neck of femur fractures
    Adams, Matthew
    Chen, Weijia
    Holcdorf, David
    McCusker, Mark W.
    Howe, Piers D. L.
    Gaillard, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [2] Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables
    Badgeley, Marcus A.
    Zech, John R.
    Oakden-Rayner, Luke
    Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
    Liu, Manway
    Gale, William
    McConnell, Michael, V
    Percha, Bethany
    Snyder, Thomas M.
    Dudley, Joel T.
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2019, 2 (1)
  • [3] Vertebral Body Compression Fractures and Bone Density: Automated Detection and Classification on CT Images
    Burns, Joseph E.
    Yao, Jianhua
    Summers, Ronald M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 284 (03) : 788 - 797
  • [4] Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of patients with myeloma
    Chantry, Andrew
    Kazmi, Majid
    Barrington, Sally
    Goh, Vicky
    Mulholland, Nicola
    Streetly, Matthew
    Lai, Maggie
    Pratt, Guy
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2017, 178 (03) : 380 - 393
  • [5] Application of a deep learning algorithm for detection and visualization of hip fractures on plain pelvic radiographs
    Cheng, Chi-Tung
    Ho, Tsung-Ying
    Lee, Tao-Yi
    Chang, Chih-Chen
    Chou, Ching-Cheng
    Chen, Chih-Chi
    Chung, I-Fang
    Liao, Chien-Hung
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (10) : 5469 - 5477
  • [6] Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm
    Chung, Seok Won
    Han, Seung Seog
    Lee, Ji Whan
    Oh, Kyung-Soo
    Kim, Na Ra
    Yoon, Jong Pil
    Kim, Joon Yub
    Moon, Sung Hoon
    Kwon, Jieun
    Lee, Hyo-Jin
    Noh, Young-Min
    Kim, Youngjun
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2018, 89 (04) : 468 - 473
  • [7] Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review
    Court-Brown, Charles M.
    Caesar, Ben
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (08): : 691 - 697
  • [8] Convergent evolution of face spaces across human face-selective neuronal groups and deep convolutional networks
    Grossman, Shany
    Gaziv, Guy
    Yeagle, Erin M.
    Harel, Michal
    Megevand, Pierre
    Groppe, David M.
    Khuvis, Simon
    Herrero, Jose L.
    Irani, Michal
    Mehta, Ashesh D.
    Malach, Rafael
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [9] Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: A study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers
    Kachalia, Allen
    Gandhi, Tejal K.
    Puopolo, Ann Louise
    Yoon, Catherine
    Thomas, Eric J.
    Griffey, Richard
    Brennan, Troyen A.
    Studdert, David M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (02) : 196 - 205
  • [10] Deep learning in fracture detection: a narrative review
    Kalmet, Pishtiwan H. S.
    Sanduleanu, Sebastian
    Primakov, Sergey
    Wu, Guangyao
    Jochems, Arthur
    Refaee, Turkey
    Ibrahim, Abdalla
    Hulst, Luca, V
    Lambin, Philippe
    Poeze, Martijn
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2020, 91 (02) : 215 - 220