Recurrence rate after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of <20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: should we worry about the risk?

被引:2
作者
Capela, Tiago Lima [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ferreira, Ana Isabel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silva, Vitor Macedo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goncalves, Tiago Curdia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Castro, Francisca Dias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotter, Jose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Senhora Oliveira Guimaraes, Gastroenterol Dept, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst ICVS, Sch Med, Braga, Portugal
[3] PT Govt Associate Lab, ICVS 3Bs, Guimaraes Braga, Portugal
[4] Hosp Senhora Oliveira, Rua Cutileiros, P-4835044 Creixomil, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Piecemeal resection; endoscopic mucosal resection; recurrence rate; colorectal polyps; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; COLONIC EMR; SOCIETY; POLYPECTOMY; NEOPLASIA; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1080/00365521.2023.2278425
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionThere is scarce data focused on recurrence neoplasia rate (RR) after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions (NPL). We aimed to analyze the RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL, identify risk factors for its development and compare it with RR after pEMR of >= 20 mm NPL.MethodsRetrospective cohort-study including all >= 10 mm NPL resected by pEMR in our center between 2018-2022 with an early repeat colonoscopy (ERC). RR was defined as recurrence neoplasia identified in the ERC EMR scar with virtual chromoendoscopy or histological confirmation.ResultsA total of 444 NPL were assessed, 124 (27.9%) with 10-19 mm. In the ERC, performed a median of 6 months after pEMR, RR was significantly lower for 10-19 mm NPL compared to >= 20 mm NPL (13/124 vs 68/320, p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, RR after pEMR of 15-19 mm NPL was significantly higher compared to 10-14 mm NPL (13/98 vs 0, p = 0.041) but not significantly different compared to >= 20 mm NPL (13/98 vs 68/320, p = 0.073). In multivariable analysis, size of NPL (HR 1.501, 95% CI 1.012-2.227, p = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor identified for RR for 10-19 mm NPL.ConclusionAlthough the early RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL is significantly lower compared to >= 20 mm NPL, it is non-negligible (10.5%) and appears to be the highest among 15-19 mm NPL. The size of the lesion was the only independent risk factor for RR. Our findings should be accounted in the selection of the most appropriate post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, pS3
[2]   Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Belderbos, Tim D. G. ;
Leenders, Max ;
Moons, Leon M. G. ;
Siersema, Peter D. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (05) :388-U121
[3]   Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019 [J].
Bisschops, Raf ;
East, James E. ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Hazewinkel, Yark ;
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Neumann, Helmut ;
Pellise, Maria ;
Antonelli, Giulio ;
Bustamante Balen, Marco ;
Coron, Emmanuel ;
Cortas, Georges ;
Iacucci, Marietta ;
Yuichi, Mori ;
Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius ;
Pilonis, Nastazja ;
Puig, Ignasi ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. ;
Dekker, Evelien .
ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (12) :1155-1179
[4]   Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas > 20 mm: Risk factors for recurrence [J].
Briedigkeit, Alexander ;
Sultanie, Omar ;
Sido, Bernd ;
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 8 (05) :276-281
[5]   Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1-to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Djinbachian, Roupen ;
Iratni, Ryma ;
Durand, Madeleine ;
Marques, Paola ;
von Renteln, Daniel .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 159 (03) :904-+
[6]   Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Early and Late Incidence, Treatment Outcomes, and Outcomes in Non-Overt (Histologic-Only) Recurrence [J].
El Rahyel, Ahmed ;
Abdullah, Noor ;
Love, Emma ;
Vemulapalli, Krishna C. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (03) :949-+
[7]   Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline [J].
Ferlitsch, Monika ;
Moss, Alan ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Paspatis, Gregorios ;
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Langner, Cord ;
Bronzwaer, Maxime ;
Nalankilli, Kumanan ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Hazzan, Rawi ;
Gralnek, Ian M. ;
Gschwantler, Michael ;
Waldmann, Elisabeth ;
Jeschek, Philip ;
Penz, Daniela ;
Heresbach, Denis ;
Moons, Leon ;
Lemmers, Arnaud ;
Paraskeva, Konstantina ;
Pohl, Juergen ;
Ponchon, Thierry ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Repici, Alessandro ;
Rutter, Matthew D. ;
Burgess, Nicholas G. ;
Bourke, Michael J. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (03) :270-297
[8]   Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Hassan, C. ;
Repici, A. ;
Sharma, P. ;
Correale, L. ;
Zullo, A. ;
Bretthauer, M. ;
Senore, C. ;
Spada, C. ;
Bellisario, Cristina ;
Bhandari, P. ;
Rex, D. K. .
GUT, 2016, 65 (05) :806-820
[9]   Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020 [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
Antonelli, Giulio ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Chaussade, Stanislas ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Ferlitsch, Monika ;
Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio ;
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Pellise, Maria ;
Pox, Christian ;
Ricciardiello, Luigi ;
Rutter, Matthew ;
Helsingen, Lise Morkved ;
Bleijenberg, Arne ;
Senore, Carlo ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Quintero, Enrique .
ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 52 (08) :687-700
[10]  
Jideh Bilel, 2019, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V29, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.giec.2019.05.002