A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges

被引:31
作者
Abas, Azlan [1 ]
Arifin, Kadir [1 ]
Ali, Mohd Azhar Mohamed [2 ]
Khairil, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Ctr Res Dev Social & Environm SEEDS, Ukm Bangi 43650, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Hulu Selangor Dist Council, Kuala Kubu Bharu 44000, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Tadulako Univ, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Cent Sulawesi, Indonesia
关键词
Government planning; Citizens participation; Development planning; Policy; Developmental study; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; RESIDENTS; IMPACT; CITY; GOVERNANCE; EXPERIENCE; MITIGATION; DISCOURSE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public participation in the decision-making process for the government or local authority planning and agenda is crucial and significant, and if not handled systematically will trigger public protest and negative perceptions of the government and lead to the failure of the national or local agenda. The current study included many research approaches and followed a stated guideline, notably the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses). This study utilised Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus as the primary databases when searching for the relevant articles. Through content analysis on the 69 selected articles, 3 main types of public participation were observed: a) access to information, b) consultation, and c) active participation. The study makes several significant contributions to the body of knowledge in development planning and public administration, as well as to practical applications.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[21]  
Cotae C, 2015, URBAN ARCHIT CONSTR, V6, P17
[22]   Community Participation in Spatial Planning: Exploring Relationships between Professional and Lay Stakeholders [J].
Curry, Nigel .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2012, 38 (03) :345-366
[23]   Inclusion in the implementation of public policy: the Polish experience [J].
Czupich, Mariusz .
EKONOMIA I PRAWO-ECONOMICS AND LAW, 2020, 19 (04) :638-655
[24]   Technocracy, democracy, and public policy: An evaluation of public participation in retrospective regulatory review [J].
DeMenno, Mercy B. .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2019, 13 (03) :362-383
[25]   Insights and recommendations for involving young people in decision making for the marine environment [J].
Devenport, Emilie ;
Brooker, Esther ;
Brooker, Adam ;
Leakey, Chris .
MARINE POLICY, 2021, 124
[26]   Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India [J].
Diduck, Alan Paul ;
Pratap, Dinesh ;
Sinclair, A. John ;
Deane, Sarra .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 :170-182
[27]   Using the Norm Activation Model to Predict the Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Public Servants at the Central and Local Governments in Taiwan [J].
Fang, Wei-Ta ;
Chiang, Yi-Te ;
Ng, Eric ;
Lo, Jen-Chieh .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
[28]   A different result of community participation in education: an Indonesian case study of parental participation in public primary schools [J].
Fitriah, Amaliah ;
Sumintono, Bambang ;
Subekti, Nanang Bagus ;
Hassan, Zainudin .
ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2013, 14 (04) :483-493
[29]   Institutionalizing participatory slum upgrading: a case study of urban co-production from Afghanistan, 2002-2016 [J].
French, Matthew ;
Popal, Abdul ;
Rahimi, Habib ;
Popuri, Srinivasa ;
Turkstra, Jan .
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2019, 31 (01) :209-230
[30]   Challenges to the implementation of health sector decentralization in Tanzania: experiences from Kongwa district council [J].
Frumence, Gasto ;
Nyamhanga, Tumaini ;
Mwangu, Mughwira ;
Hurtig, Anna-Karin .
GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2013, 6