A Systematic Review and Meta-analytic Evaluation of Moral Distress in Oncology Nursing

BackgroundWeighing implications of multiple intensive cancer-directed therapies over time, oncology nurses are more prone to intrinsic distress compared to nurses in non-oncologic settings. This vulnerability may give rise to moral distress. Yet, little is known about moral distress experiences of oncology nurses.ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis examined the frequency and intensity of moral distress among oncology nurses with an exploratory focus on nurse-level and work-related characteristics.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of 7 electronic databases (2000-2020) supplemented by hand-search strategy. Means and standard deviations of moral distress scores in the included studies were extracted and pooled in our meta-analysis.ResultsOur sample of 8 cross-sectional studies consisting of 2686 participants with 1654 oncology nurses met criteria for inclusion. A random-effects model was used in our meta-analysis given considerable heterogeneity. Our results suggest that moral distress was of low to moderate frequency, but of high intensity. Moral distress among oncology nurses was a significant predictor for burnout, provider communication, decisions surrounding end-of-life care, work conditions (eg, patient assignment, type of unit), and inability to provide compassionate care.ConclusionMoral distress in oncology nurses is associated with burnout syndrome, compassion fatigue, and secondary traumatic stress syndrome, all of which are linked to poor patient care and outcomes. Robust psychological well-being is critical in minimizing unintended consequences of moral distress.Implications for PracticeOncology nurses are at high risk for moral distress due to the nature of their work. Future studies should examine the prevalence among oncology nurses to help inform targeted interventions.