Cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization cycle via progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve: an open-label, randomized controlled trial

被引:5
作者
Ye, Hongjuan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Liya [2 ]
Quan, Xinxin [2 ]
Hou, Min [2 ]
Ma, Huilan [2 ]
Xue, Songguo [2 ]
Yu, Zhao [1 ]
Chen, Qiuju [3 ]
Sun, Lihua [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Life Sci & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Shanghai East Hosp, Dept Reprod Med Ctr, Shanghai 200123, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Assisted Reprod, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
Female infertility; gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist; in vitro fertilization; ovarian stimulation; ovarian reserve; progestin; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; GNRH-ANTAGONIST; LH SURGE;
D O I
10.1080/14647273.2024.2316005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve (NOR). Infertile women with NOR who underwent their first IVF cycle were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a freeze-all strategy with delayed embryo transfer (PPOS group, n = 174) and fresh embryo transfer first (GnRH-ant group, n = 174). The primary outcome was the cLBR per aspiration. The cLBR between the PPOS group and GnRH-ant group were comparable (55.75% vs. 52.87%, p = 0.591). A premature luteinizing hormone surge was not observed in the PPOS group, while there were six cases (3.45%) in the GnRH-ant group, but no premature ovulation in either of the groups. The pregnancy outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate, were all comparable. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and viable embryos were similar (all p > 0.05) between the two groups.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF [J].
Massin, Nathalie .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2017, 23 (02) :211-220
[22]   Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine [J].
Pfeifer, Samantha ;
Butts, Samantha ;
Dumesic, Daniel ;
Fossum, Gregory ;
Gracia, Clarisa ;
La Barbera, Andrew ;
Mersereau, Jennifer ;
Odem, Randall ;
Paulson, Richard ;
Penzias, Alan ;
Pisarska, Margareta ;
Rebar, Robert ;
Reindollar, Richard ;
Rosen, Mitchell ;
Sandlow, Jay ;
Vernon, Michael ;
Widra, Eric .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (07) :1634-1647
[23]   ENDOCRINE EFFECTS AND PHARMACOKINETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A POTENT NEW GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE ANTAGONIST (GANIRELIX) WITH MINIMAL HISTAMINE-RELEASING PROPERTIES - STUDIES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN [J].
RABINOVICI, J ;
ROTHMAN, P ;
MONROE, SE ;
NERENBERG, C ;
JAFFE, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1992, 75 (05) :1220-1225
[24]   The ovulation trigger-OPU time interval of different ovarian protocols in ART: a retrospective study [J].
Shen, Xi ;
Long, Hui ;
Guo, Wenya ;
Xie, Yating ;
Gao, Hongyuan ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Wang, Yun ;
Lyu, Qifeng ;
Kuang, Yanping ;
Wang, Li .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 302 (02) :519-527
[25]   Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols [J].
Toftager, M. ;
Bogstad, J. ;
Lossl, K. ;
Praetorius, L. ;
Zedeler, A. ;
Bryndorf, T. ;
Nilas, L. ;
Pinborg, A. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (03) :556-567
[26]   Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [J].
Wang, Yun ;
Kuang, Yanping ;
Chen, Qiuju ;
Cai, Renfei .
TRIALS, 2018, 19
[27]   Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Using Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and hMG in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Treated for IVF A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial [J].
Wang, Yun ;
Chen, Qiuju ;
Wang, NingLing ;
Chen, Hong ;
Lyu, Qifeng ;
Kuang, Yanping .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
[28]   Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Wei, Daimin ;
Liu, Jia-Yin ;
Sun, Yun ;
Shi, Yuhua ;
Zhang, Bo ;
Liu, Jian-Qiao ;
Tan, Jichun ;
Liang, Xiaoyun ;
Cao, Yunxia ;
Wang, Ze ;
Qin, Yingying ;
Zhao, Han ;
Zhou, Yi ;
Ren, Haiqin ;
Hao, Guimin ;
Ling, Xiufeng ;
Zhao, Junzhao ;
Zhang, Yunshan ;
Qi, Xiujuan ;
Zhang, Lin ;
Deng, Xiaohui ;
Chen, Xiaoli ;
Zhu, Yimin ;
Wang, Xiaohong ;
Tian, Li-Feng ;
Lv, Qun ;
Ma, Xiang ;
Zhang, Heping ;
Legro, Richard S. ;
Chen, Zi-Jiang .
LANCET, 2019, 393 (10178) :1310-1318
[29]   Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response [J].
Xiao, Zhuo-ni ;
Peng, Jia-li ;
Yang, Jing ;
Xu, Wang-ming .
CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 39 (03) :431-436
[30]   Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology [J].
Yildiz, Sule ;
Turkgeldi, Engin ;
Angun, Berk ;
Eraslan, Alper ;
Urman, Bulent ;
Ata, Baris .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (04) :677-683