Evaluating the impact of the supporting the advancement of research skills (STARS) programme on research knowledge, engagement and capacity-building in a health and social care organisation in England

被引:0
作者
Tajuria, Gulshan [1 ,2 ]
Dobel-Ober, David [1 ]
Bradley, Eleanor [3 ]
Charnley, Claire [1 ]
Lambley-Burke, Ruth [1 ]
Mallen, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Honeyford, Kate [1 ]
Kingstone, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Midlands Partnership Univ NHS Fdn Trust, St Georges Hosp, Res & Innovat Dept, Block 7,Corp St, Stafford ST16 3AG, England
[2] Keele Univ, Sch Med, David Weatherall Bldg, Newcastle Upon Tyne ST5 5BG, England
[3] Univ Worcester, Coll Hlth & Sci, Henwick Rd, Worcester WR2 6AJ, Worcs, England
关键词
Research capacity development (RCD); Continuing Professional Development (CPD); Research skills development; Barriers to research engagement; Evaluation; Evidence-based practice; PERCEPTIONS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05059-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact a novel education programme - to improve research engagement, awareness, understanding and confidence - had on a diverse health and social care workforce. Barriers and facilitators to engagement were explored together with research capacity-building opportunities and ways to embed a research culture. The programme is entitled 'Supporting The Advancement of Research Skills' (STARS programme); the paper reports findings from a health and social care setting in England, UK.MethodsA four-level outcome framework guided the approach to evaluation and was further informed by key principles of research capacity development and relevant theory. Quantitative data were collected from learners before and after engagement; these were analysed descriptively. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with learners and analysed thematically. A purposive sample was achieved to include a diversity in age, gender, health and social care profession, and level of attendance (regular attendees, moderate attendees and non-attenders).ResultsThe evaluation spanned 18 half-day workshops and 11 seminars delivered by expert educators. 165 (2% of total staff at Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (MPFT)) staffs booked one or more education sessions; 128 (77%) including Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), psychologists, nursing and midwifery, and social workers attended one or more session. Key themes of engagement with teaching sessions, relevance and impact of training and promoting a research active environment were identified with relevant sub-themes. Positive impacts of training were described in terms of research confidence, intentions, career planning and application of research skills as a direct result of training. Lack of dedicated time for research engagement, work pressures and time commitments required for the programme were key barriers. Facilitators that facilitated engagement are also described.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate the impact that a free, virtual and high-quality research education programme had at individual and organisational levels. The programme is the product of a successful collaboration between health and social care and academic organisations; this provides a useful framework for others to adapt and adopt. Key barriers to attendance and engagement spoke to system-wide challenges that an education programme could not address in the short-term. Potential solutions are discussed in relation to protecting staff time, achieving management buy-in, recognising research champions, and having a clear communication strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Open education resources and perceptions of financial value [J].
Abramovich, Samuel ;
McBride, Mark .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 39 :33-38
[2]   Utilizing asynchronous email interviews for health research: overview of benefits and drawbacks [J].
Amri, Michelle ;
Angelakis, Christina ;
Logan, Dilani .
BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2021, 14 (01)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
[4]   Tom Sawyer and the construction of value [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Prelec, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (01) :1-10
[5]   Students' perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic A survey study of Polish medical students [J].
Baczek, Michal ;
Zaganczyk-Baczek, Michalina ;
Szpringer, Monika ;
Jaroszynski, Andrzej ;
Wozakowska-Kaplon, Beata .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (07) :E24821
[6]   The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs [J].
Barouki, Robert ;
Kogevinas, Manolis ;
Audouze, Karine ;
Belesova, Kristine ;
Bergman, Ake ;
Birnbaum, Linda ;
Boekhold, Sandra ;
Denys, Sebastien ;
Desseille, Celine ;
Drakvik, Elina ;
Frumkin, Howard ;
Garric, Jeanne ;
Destoumieux-Garzon, Delphine ;
Haines, Andrew ;
Huss, Anke ;
Jensen, Genon ;
Karakitsios, Spyros ;
Klanova, Jana ;
Koskela, Iida-Maria ;
Laden, Francine ;
Marano, Francelyne ;
Matthies-Wiesler, Eva Franziska ;
Morris, George ;
Nowacki, Julia ;
Paloniemi, Riikka ;
Pearce, Neil ;
Peters, Annette ;
Rekola, Aino ;
Sarigiannis, Denis ;
Sebkova, Katerinaa ;
Slama, Remy ;
Staatsen, Brigit ;
Tonne, Cathryn ;
Vermeulen, Roel ;
Vineis, Paolo .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 146
[7]   Building capacity to use and undertake research in health organisations: a survey of training needs and priorities among staff [J].
Barratt, Helen ;
Fulop, Naomi J. .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (12)
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[9]   Collaboration between health services managers and researchers: making a difference? [J].
Bullock, Alison ;
Morris, Zoe Slote ;
Atwell, Christine .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2012, 17 :2-10
[10]   Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study [J].
Burkinshaw, Paula ;
Bryant, Louise D. ;
Magee, Caroline ;
Thompson, Peter ;
Cotterill, Lisa Ann ;
Mulvey, Matthew R. ;
Hewison, Jenny .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01)