Psychological assessment of AI-based decision support systems: tool development and expected benefits

被引:0
|
作者
Buschmeyer, Katharina [1 ]
Hatfield, Sarah [1 ]
Zenner, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Augsburg Tech Univ Appl Sci, Fac Business, Augsburg, Germany
[2] Augsburg Tech Univ Appl Sci, Fac Liberal Arts & Sci, Augsburg, Germany
来源
关键词
AI-based decision support systems; work; human-centered evaluation; survey inventory; system properties; characteristics of the supported task; psychological load; INFORMATION OVERLOAD; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; AGENT TRANSPARENCY; USER SATISFACTION; IMPACT; WORK; PERFORMANCE; USABILITY; EASE; FIT;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2023.1249322
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop an evaluation tool that assesses the use of AI-based decision support systems (DSSs) in professional practice from a human-centered perspective. Following the International Organization for Standardization, this perspective aims to ensure that the use of interactive technologies improves users' psychological load experience and behavior, e.g., in the form of reduced stress experience or increased performance. Concomitantly, this perspective attempts to proactively prevent or detect and correct the potential negative effects of these technologies on user load, such as impaired satisfaction and engagement, as early as possible. Based on this perspective, we developed and validated a questionnaire instrument, the Psychological Assessment of AI-based DSSs (PAAI), for the user-centered evaluation of the use of AI-based DSSs in practice. In particular, the instrument considers central design characteristics of AI-based DSSs and the corresponding work situation, which have a significant impact on users' psychological load. The instrument was tested in two independent studies. In Study 1, N = 223 individuals were recruited. Based on the results of item and scale analyses and an exploratory factor analysis, the newly developed instrument was refined, and the final version was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. Findings showed acceptable-to-good fit indices, confirming the factorial validity of the PAAI. This was confirmed in a second study, which had N = 471 participants. Again, the CFA yielded acceptable-to-good fit indices. The validity was further confirmed using convergent and criterion validity analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic
    Braun, Matthias
    Hummel, Patrik
    Beck, Susanne
    Dabrock, Peter
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 47 (12) : E3
  • [2] AI-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING IN THE FACTORY OF THE FUTURE
    JACKSON, S
    BROWNE, J
    COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1992, 5 (02): : 83 - 90
  • [3] Review and Evaluation of AI-Based Algorithms for Wound Assessment and Decision Support
    Fayyazbakhsh, Fateme
    Zendehdel, Niloofar
    Chen, Haodong
    Gould, Lisa
    Leu, Ming
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2024, 32 (04) : 587 - 587
  • [4] AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool on Mobile Devices for Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Loiotile, Annamaria Demarinis
    Dentamaro, Vincenzo
    Giglio, Paolo
    Impedovo, Donato
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, INTERACT 2021, PT I, 2021, 12932 : 139 - 148
  • [5] Explainability in medicine in an era of AI-based clinical decision support systems
    Pierce, Robin L.
    Van Biesen, Wim
    Van Cauwenberge, Daan
    Decruyenaere, Johan
    Sterckx, Sigrid
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [6] Build confidence and acceptance of AI-based decision support systems - Explainable and liable AI
    Nicodeme, Claire
    2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SYSTEM INTERACTION (HSI), 2020, : 20 - 23
  • [7] AIM - AN AI-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
    BEWLEY, WL
    ROSENBERG, DA
    ADVANCES IN AI AND SIMULATION, 1989, 20 : 61 - 67
  • [8] AI-Based Decision Support for Organizational Processes
    Tavanapour, Navid
    Gierlich-Joas, Maren
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 57TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, : 799 - 799
  • [9] AI-Based Decision Support for Organizational Processes
    Tavanapour, Navid
    Gierlich-Joas, Maren
    Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2024,
  • [10] AI-BASED RAPID PLACENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOL
    Gernand, Alison D.
    Goldstein, Jeffery A.
    Parks, W. Tony
    Chen, Yukun
    Zhang, Zhuomin
    Davaasuren, Dolzodmaa
    Wu, Chenyan
    Beck, Celeste
    Taylor, Leigh
    Wang, James Z.
    PLACENTA, 2019, 83 : E84 - E85