A Systematic Review on Students' Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation

被引:19
作者
Yan, Zi [1 ]
Panadero, Ernesto [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiang [4 ]
Zhan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Deusto, Fac Educ & Deportes, Bilbao, Spain
[3] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Bilbao, Spain
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Sport Phys Educ & Hlth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Self-assessment; Perception; Perceived usefulness; Implementation; PEER-ASSESSMENT; ATTITUDES; FEEDBACK; CONCEPTIONS; BELIEFS; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-023-09799-1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Students are the central agent in self-assessment; therefore, their perceptions are crucial for successful self-assessment. Despite the increasing number of empirical studies exploring how students perceive self-assessment, systematic reviews synthesising students' perceptions of self-assessment and relating them to self-assessment implementation are scarce. This review covered 44 eligible studies and synthesised findings related to two key aspects of students' perceptions of self-assessment: (1) usefulness of self-assessment; and (2) factors influencing their implementation of self-assessment. The results revealed inconclusive findings regarding students' perceived usefulness of self-assessment. Although most studies reported a generally positive perception of self-assessment among students, some studies revealed students' skepticism about its usefulness. Usefulness was influenced by specific individual factors (i.e., gender, age, and educational level) and instructional factors (i.e., external feedback, use of instruments, and self-assessment purpose). Additionally, implementation was influenced by specific individual factors (i.e., perceived usefulness, affective attitude, self-efficacy, important others, and psychological safety) and instructional factors (i.e., practice and training, external feedback, use of instruments, and environmental support). The findings of this review contribute to a better understanding of students' perceptions of self-assessment and shed light on the design and implementation of meaningful self-assessment activities that cater to students' learning needs.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [41] Logan B., 2015, Research in Higher Education Journal, V29, P1
  • [42] Supporting students' intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance
    Mendoza, Norman B.
    Yan, Zi
    King, Ronnel B.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2023, 193
  • [43] Ndoye A., 2017, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, V29, P255
  • [44] The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes
    Nicol, David
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (05) : 756 - 778
  • [45] The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement
    Nikou, Stavros A.
    Economides, Anastasios A.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 55 : 1241 - 1248
  • [46] Orsmond P., 1997, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V22, P357, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293970220401
  • [47] The importance of self-assessment in students' use of tutors' feedback: a qualitative study of high and non-high achieving biology undergraduates
    Orsmond, Paul
    Merry, Stephen
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) : 737 - 753
  • [48] Panadero E, 2019, IMPACT OF FEEDBACK IN HIGHER EDUCATION: IMPROVING ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES FOR LEARNERS, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_9
  • [49] Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self efficacy: Four meta-analyses
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Jonsson, Anders
    Botella, Juan
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 22 : 74 - 98
  • [50] The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Brown, Gavin T. L.
    Strijbos, Jan-Willem
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 28 (04) : 803 - 830