Treatment preferences among patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis

被引:9
作者
Myers, Kelley [1 ]
Silverberg, Jonathan I. [2 ]
Parasuraman, Shreekant [3 ]
Pierce, Anna [1 ]
Eichenfield, Lawrence F. [4 ,5 ]
Poulos, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC USA
[3] Incyte Corp, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Dermatol, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; atopic dermatitis; patient preferences; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/09546634.2023.2215356
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Study purpose: New treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are emerging; however, little is known about the treatment preferences of patients with mild-to-moderate AD. To measure patients' preferences, a cross-sectional, web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was developed and administered to 300 adults in the United States with a self-reported physician diagnosis of mild-to-moderate AD. Materials and methods: In the DCE, respondents evaluated pairs of hypothetical AD treatment profiles defined by efficacy, risk, and mode and frequency of administration attributes. The DCE data were analyzed using a random parameters logit model. Subgroup analysis was used to investigate preference heterogeneity. Results: The results revealed achieving clear or almost clear skin within 3-4 months of treatment was the most important attribute relative to all other study attributes. The results indicated that a topical cream applied twice daily was preferred to systemic treatments. Subgroup analysis revealed that respondents with lower self-assessed disease burden were more likely to choose topical over systemic treatments and less averse to the risk of pain, burning, and/or stinging from the medicine (all other treatment features remaining equal) than respondents with higher self-assessed disease burden. Conclusion: The results of this study can help inform shared decision-making to manage mild-to-moderate AD.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Quantifying patient preferences for systemic atopic dermatitis treatments using a discrete-choice experiment
    Boeri, Marco
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Hauber, Brett
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Romero, William
    Di Bonaventura, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (03) : 1449 - 1458
  • [2] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [3] Prevalence and Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review
    Bylund, Simon
    von Kobyletzki, Laura B.
    Svalstedt, Marika
    Svensson, Ake
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2020, 100 : 320 - 329
  • [4] Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis Section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis
    Eichenfield, Lawrence F.
    Tom, Wynnis L.
    Chamlin, Sarah L.
    Feldman, Steven R.
    Hanifin, Jon M.
    Simpson, Eric L.
    Berger, Timothy G.
    Bergman, James N.
    Cohen, David E.
    Cooper, Kevin D.
    Cordoro, Kelly M.
    Davis, Dawn M.
    Krol, Alfons
    Margolis, David J.
    Paller, Amy S.
    Schwarzenberger, Kathryn
    Silverman, Robert A.
    Williams, Hywel C.
    Elmets, Craig A.
    Block, Julie
    Harrod, Christopher G.
    Begolka, Wendy Smith
    Sidbury, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 70 (02) : 338 - 351
  • [5] Eichenfield LF., 2017, SEMIN CUTAN MED SURG, V36, P1
  • [6] Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
    Prior, Thomas
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Cunningham, Charles
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 300 - 315
  • [7] Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Lancsar, Emily
    Marshall, Deborah
    Kilambi, Vikram
    Muehlbacher, Axel
    Regier, Dean A.
    Bresnahan, Brian W.
    Kanninen, Barbara
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [8] EFFICIENT EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN WITH MARKETING-RESEARCH APPLICATIONS
    KUHFELD, WF
    TOBIAS, RD
    GARRATT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (04) : 545 - 557
  • [9] Kuhfeld WF., 2010, Marketing Research Methods in SAS
  • [10] Testing for the survey mode effect on contingent valuation data quality: A case study of web based versus in-person interviews
    Marta-Pedroso, Cristina
    Freitas, Helena
    Domingos, Tiago
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (3-4) : 388 - 398