Short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for total gastrectomy: a single-institute experience

BackgroundThe efficacy of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RLS) for total gastrectomy remains unclear. This study focused on evaluating the short-term outcomes of RLS compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for total gastrectomy.MethodsOne hundred and ten patients who underwent completed laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between September 2018 and June 2022 were retrospectively collected and classified into two groups (65 CLS and 45 RLS) according to different operation approach. Twenty-four RLS cases underwent single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 2) and twenty-one underwent single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1). Surgical outcomes, pain intensity, cosmetic and postoperative morbidity, and mortality were compared between groups.ResultsThe overall incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the CLS group and the RLS group (16.9% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.270). It was also comparable in the Clavien-Dindo classification (P = 0.774). However, compared with the CLS group, the RLS group had a significantly shorter total length of incision (5.6 +/- 1.0 cm vs. 7.1 +/- 0.7 cm, P = 0.000); shorter time to first ambulation (24.9 +/- 5.9 h vs. 27.6 +/- 5.0 h, P = 0.009), flatus (3.0 +/- 0.8 d vs. 3.5 +/- 1.0 d, P = 0.022) and oral intake (4.0 +/- 1.6 d vs. 6.1 +/- 5.1 d, P = 0.011); lower white blood cell count on the third day after the operation (9.8 +/- 4.0*10(9)/L vs. 11.6 +/- 4.7*10(9)/L, P = 0.037); and lower visual analogue scale score on postoperative days 1 and 3(3.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.7, P = 0.044 and 0.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, P = 0.000 respectively). On the other hand, it didn't find any difference in short-term outcomes between the SILS + 2 group and the SILS + 1 group (P > 0.05). But the proximal resection margin was longer in the SILS + 2 group than in the SILS + 1 group (2.6 +/- 0.7 cm vs. 1.5 +/- 0.9 cm, P = 0.046) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).ConclusionsRLS for total gastrectomy is a feasible and safe technique when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Moreover, compared with SILS + 1, SILS + 2 might have some advantages in AEG patients.